КоммерсантЪ пишет, что министерство финансов РФ предлагает установить единые правила распределения бюджетных средств среди подрядчиков госкорпораций, государственных АО и публично-правовых компаний. Им придется проводить конкурентный отбор в системе «Электронный бюджет».
По мнению Минфина, это должно повысить прозрачность процесса и облегчить доступ бизнеса к бюджетным средствам.
Интересно, конечно, госкорпорации связаны законами о госзакупках, теперь и будут связаны и системой государственного бюджетирования. Может тогда обратно их в министерства влить, как в СССР. Для чего теперь эти декоративные форматы?
КоммерсантЪ пишет, что министерство финансов РФ предлагает установить единые правила распределения бюджетных средств среди подрядчиков госкорпораций, государственных АО и публично-правовых компаний. Им придется проводить конкурентный отбор в системе «Электронный бюджет».
По мнению Минфина, это должно повысить прозрачность процесса и облегчить доступ бизнеса к бюджетным средствам.
Интересно, конечно, госкорпорации связаны законами о госзакупках, теперь и будут связаны и системой государственного бюджетирования. Может тогда обратно их в министерства влить, как в СССР. Для чего теперь эти декоративные форматы?
BY Старая площадь
Warning: Undefined variable $i in /var/www/group-telegram/post.php on line 260
At the start of 2018, the company attempted to launch an Initial Coin Offering (ICO) which would enable it to enable payments (and earn the cash that comes from doing so). The initial signals were promising, especially given Telegram’s user base is already fairly crypto-savvy. It raised an initial tranche of cash – worth more than a billion dollars – to help develop the coin before opening sales to the public. Unfortunately, third-party sales of coins bought in those initial fundraising rounds raised the ire of the SEC, which brought the hammer down on the whole operation. In 2020, officials ordered Telegram to pay a fine of $18.5 million and hand back much of the cash that it had raised. Emerson Brooking, a disinformation expert at the Atlantic Council's Digital Forensic Research Lab, said: "Back in the Wild West period of content moderation, like 2014 or 2015, maybe they could have gotten away with it, but it stands in marked contrast with how other companies run themselves today." "The argument from Telegram is, 'You should trust us because we tell you that we're trustworthy,'" Maréchal said. "It's really in the eye of the beholder whether that's something you want to buy into." The company maintains that it cannot act against individual or group chats, which are “private amongst their participants,” but it will respond to requests in relation to sticker sets, channels and bots which are publicly available. During the invasion of Ukraine, Pavel Durov has wrestled with this issue a lot more prominently than he has before. Channels like Donbass Insider and Bellum Acta, as reported by Foreign Policy, started pumping out pro-Russian propaganda as the invasion began. So much so that the Ukrainian National Security and Defense Council issued a statement labeling which accounts are Russian-backed. Ukrainian officials, in potential violation of the Geneva Convention, have shared imagery of dead and captured Russian soldiers on the platform. Two days after Russia invaded Ukraine, an account on the Telegram messaging platform posing as President Volodymyr Zelenskiy urged his armed forces to surrender.
from vn
