Jetzt schaltet sich diese Behörde dazu, um den Druck zu erhöhen, dass AUF1 nicht aus den RĂ€umen des Parlaments berichten darf. Also: das System braucht die "Sektenbehörde", um AUF1 als "gefĂ€hrlich" darzustellen. Das ist besonders skurril, weil eben genau diese Zerstörung der Pressefreiheit die System-Sekte im Parlament schĂŒtzen soll. Sektenbehörde schĂŒtzt System-Sekte.
Ich habe es gestern abend vorausgesagt: Der Deep State wird alles auffahren, um uns am Wahlabend 29.09. aus dem Parlament zu verbannen! In jedem Fall steht fest: Wir berichten live ĂŒber die Schicksalswahl in Ăsterreich am kommenden Sonntag!
Jetzt schaltet sich diese Behörde dazu, um den Druck zu erhöhen, dass AUF1 nicht aus den RĂ€umen des Parlaments berichten darf. Also: das System braucht die "Sektenbehörde", um AUF1 als "gefĂ€hrlich" darzustellen. Das ist besonders skurril, weil eben genau diese Zerstörung der Pressefreiheit die System-Sekte im Parlament schĂŒtzen soll. Sektenbehörde schĂŒtzt System-Sekte.
Ich habe es gestern abend vorausgesagt: Der Deep State wird alles auffahren, um uns am Wahlabend 29.09. aus dem Parlament zu verbannen! In jedem Fall steht fest: Wir berichten live ĂŒber die Schicksalswahl in Ăsterreich am kommenden Sonntag!
The fake Zelenskiy account reached 20,000 followers on Telegram before it was shut down, a remedial action that experts say is all too rare. Telegram, which does little policing of its content, has also became a hub for Russian propaganda and misinformation. Many pro-Kremlin channels have become popular, alongside accounts of journalists and other independent observers. Given the pro-privacy stance of the platform, itâs taken as a given that itâll be used for a number of reasons, not all of them good. And Telegram has been attached to a fair few scandals related to terrorism, sexual exploitation and crime. Back in 2015, Vox described Telegram as âISISâ app of choice,â saying that the platformâs real use is the ability to use channels to distribute material to large groups at once. Telegram has acted to remove public channels affiliated with terrorism, but Pavel Durov reiterated that he had no business snooping on private conversations. The original Telegram channel has expanded into a web of accounts for different locations, including specific pages made for individual Russian cities. There's also an English-language website, which states it is owned by the people who run the Telegram channels. Right now the digital security needs of Russians and Ukrainians are very different, and they lead to very different caveats about how to mitigate the risks associated with using Telegram. For Ukrainians in Ukraine, whose physical safety is at risk because they are in a war zone, digital security is probably not their highest priority. They may value access to news and communication with their loved ones over making sure that all of their communications are encrypted in such a manner that they are indecipherable to Telegram, its employees, or governments with court orders.
from vn
