Всё-таки гений - исключительное дело. Обратите внимание на лаконичность и ясность мысли.
Для тех, кому лень: 2005 год, Adobe нанимает людей из Apple, одного уже наняли, ещё многих переманивают. Стив Джобс пишет об этом письмо директору Adobe, где говорит, что у него политика - не нанимать из Adobe (высшая степень дружбы между компаниями). Но, раз у Adobe подход другой, один из них политику должен поменять.
К такому надо стремиться: сколько стиля и власти в скромном "please let me know who".
Upd. Против Adobe и Apple было дело по этому поводу - наверное, так и стало доступным письмо, потому что document production.
And in the past few years, the DOJ brought three civil enforcement actions against technology companies (eBay and Intuit, Lucasfilm and Pixar, and Adobe, Apple, Google, Intel, Intuit, and Pixar) that entered into “no poach” agreements with competitors. In all three cases, the competitors agreed not to cold call each other’s employees. In two cases, at least one company also agreed to limit its hiring of employees who currently worked at a competitor.
All three cases ended in consent judgments against the technology companies.
Всё-таки гений - исключительное дело. Обратите внимание на лаконичность и ясность мысли.
Для тех, кому лень: 2005 год, Adobe нанимает людей из Apple, одного уже наняли, ещё многих переманивают. Стив Джобс пишет об этом письмо директору Adobe, где говорит, что у него политика - не нанимать из Adobe (высшая степень дружбы между компаниями). Но, раз у Adobe подход другой, один из них политику должен поменять.
К такому надо стремиться: сколько стиля и власти в скромном "please let me know who".
Upd. Против Adobe и Apple было дело по этому поводу - наверное, так и стало доступным письмо, потому что document production.
And in the past few years, the DOJ brought three civil enforcement actions against technology companies (eBay and Intuit, Lucasfilm and Pixar, and Adobe, Apple, Google, Intel, Intuit, and Pixar) that entered into “no poach” agreements with competitors. In all three cases, the competitors agreed not to cold call each other’s employees. In two cases, at least one company also agreed to limit its hiring of employees who currently worked at a competitor.
All three cases ended in consent judgments against the technology companies.
The next bit isn’t clear, but Durov reportedly claimed that his resignation, dated March 21st, was an April Fools’ prank. TechCrunch implies that it was a matter of principle, but it’s hard to be clear on the wheres, whos and whys. Similarly, on April 17th, the Moscow Times quoted Durov as saying that he quit the company after being pressured to reveal account details about Ukrainians protesting the then-president Viktor Yanukovych. Recently, Durav wrote on his Telegram channel that users' right to privacy, in light of the war in Ukraine, is "sacred, now more than ever." The S&P 500 fell 1.3% to 4,204.36, and the Dow Jones Industrial Average was down 0.7% to 32,943.33. The Dow posted a fifth straight weekly loss — its longest losing streak since 2019. The Nasdaq Composite tumbled 2.2% to 12,843.81. Though all three indexes opened in the green, stocks took a turn after a new report showed U.S. consumer sentiment deteriorated more than expected in early March as consumers' inflation expectations soared to the highest since 1981. These administrators had built substantial positions in these scrips prior to the circulation of recommendations and offloaded their positions subsequent to rise in price of these scrips, making significant profits at the expense of unsuspecting investors, Sebi noted. On Telegram’s website, it says that Pavel Durov “supports Telegram financially and ideologically while Nikolai (Duvov)’s input is technological.” Currently, the Telegram team is based in Dubai, having moved around from Berlin, London and Singapore after departing Russia. Meanwhile, the company which owns Telegram is registered in the British Virgin Islands.
from vn
