Рэпрэсіі: 1 год калоніі далі Максіму Крондзе за абразу Лукашэнкі. Алега Зыкуна судзяць за распаўсюджванне персанальных даных міліцыянераў. Спецназ затрымаў берасцейца за пратэсты 2020 года.
Новыя "экстрэмісцкія матэрыялы": суды вобласці забаранілі сайт і інстаграм "Першы Пінскі" ды группу ў "Аднакласніках".
Рэпрэсіі: 1 год калоніі далі Максіму Крондзе за абразу Лукашэнкі. Алега Зыкуна судзяць за распаўсюджванне персанальных даных міліцыянераў. Спецназ затрымаў берасцейца за пратэсты 2020 года.
Новыя "экстрэмісцкія матэрыялы": суды вобласці забаранілі сайт і інстаграм "Першы Пінскі" ды группу ў "Аднакласніках".
Channels are not fully encrypted, end-to-end. All communications on a Telegram channel can be seen by anyone on the channel and are also visible to Telegram. Telegram may be asked by a government to hand over the communications from a channel. Telegram has a history of standing up to Russian government requests for data, but how comfortable you are relying on that history to predict future behavior is up to you. Because Telegram has this data, it may also be stolen by hackers or leaked by an internal employee. Telegram has gained a reputation as the “secure” communications app in the post-Soviet states, but whenever you make choices about your digital security, it’s important to start by asking yourself, “What exactly am I securing? And who am I securing it from?” These questions should inform your decisions about whether you are using the right tool or platform for your digital security needs. Telegram is certainly not the most secure messaging app on the market right now. Its security model requires users to place a great deal of trust in Telegram’s ability to protect user data. For some users, this may be good enough for now. For others, it may be wiser to move to a different platform for certain kinds of high-risk communications. But because group chats and the channel features are not end-to-end encrypted, Galperin said user privacy is potentially under threat. Unlike Silicon Valley giants such as Facebook and Twitter, which run very public anti-disinformation programs, Brooking said: "Telegram is famously lax or absent in its content moderation policy." For example, WhatsApp restricted the number of times a user could forward something, and developed automated systems that detect and flag objectionable content.
from vn
