Израиль сегодня опроверг вброс про удар по российской базе Хмеймим. А многие ведь подхватили. Вообще по прогнозам будет разрядка скоро в регионе. 2-3 дня Израиль еще покошмарит, а потом разочарует сторонников версии апокалипсиса. Поэтому нам и не надо втягиваться.
Израиль сегодня опроверг вброс про удар по российской базе Хмеймим. А многие ведь подхватили. Вообще по прогнозам будет разрядка скоро в регионе. 2-3 дня Израиль еще покошмарит, а потом разочарует сторонников версии апокалипсиса. Поэтому нам и не надо втягиваться.
BY Win/Win
Warning: Undefined variable $i in /var/www/group-telegram/post.php on line 260
Telegram has gained a reputation as the “secure” communications app in the post-Soviet states, but whenever you make choices about your digital security, it’s important to start by asking yourself, “What exactly am I securing? And who am I securing it from?” These questions should inform your decisions about whether you are using the right tool or platform for your digital security needs. Telegram is certainly not the most secure messaging app on the market right now. Its security model requires users to place a great deal of trust in Telegram’s ability to protect user data. For some users, this may be good enough for now. For others, it may be wiser to move to a different platform for certain kinds of high-risk communications. Telegram, which does little policing of its content, has also became a hub for Russian propaganda and misinformation. Many pro-Kremlin channels have become popular, alongside accounts of journalists and other independent observers. Telegram does offer end-to-end encrypted communications through Secret Chats, but this is not the default setting. Standard conversations use the MTProto method, enabling server-client encryption but with them stored on the server for ease-of-access. This makes using Telegram across multiple devices simple, but also means that the regular Telegram chats you’re having with folks are not as secure as you may believe. Emerson Brooking, a disinformation expert at the Atlantic Council's Digital Forensic Research Lab, said: "Back in the Wild West period of content moderation, like 2014 or 2015, maybe they could have gotten away with it, but it stands in marked contrast with how other companies run themselves today." But because group chats and the channel features are not end-to-end encrypted, Galperin said user privacy is potentially under threat.
from vn
