Посредником между Москвой и Трампом сейчас выступает Виктор Орбан. Ранее он тоже выступал в этой роли. Есть версия, что общаемся с Дональдом Ивановичем через Венгрию и сейчас. Надо последить сейчас за выступлениями Маска и Такера, они могут служить мерилом идущих переговоров. Если они идут.
Посредником между Москвой и Трампом сейчас выступает Виктор Орбан. Ранее он тоже выступал в этой роли. Есть версия, что общаемся с Дональдом Ивановичем через Венгрию и сейчас. Надо последить сейчас за выступлениями Маска и Такера, они могут служить мерилом идущих переговоров. Если они идут.
BY Win/Win
Warning: Undefined variable $i in /var/www/group-telegram/post.php on line 260
"The result is on this photo: fiery 'greetings' to the invaders," the Security Service of Ukraine wrote alongside a photo showing several military vehicles among plumes of black smoke. Telegram does offer end-to-end encrypted communications through Secret Chats, but this is not the default setting. Standard conversations use the MTProto method, enabling server-client encryption but with them stored on the server for ease-of-access. This makes using Telegram across multiple devices simple, but also means that the regular Telegram chats you’re having with folks are not as secure as you may believe. But Telegram says people want to keep their chat history when they get a new phone, and they like having a data backup that will sync their chats across multiple devices. And that is why they let people choose whether they want their messages to be encrypted or not. When not turned on, though, chats are stored on Telegram's services, which are scattered throughout the world. But it has "disclosed 0 bytes of user data to third parties, including governments," Telegram states on its website. If you initiate a Secret Chat, however, then these communications are end-to-end encrypted and are tied to the device you are using. That means it’s less convenient to access them across multiple platforms, but you are at far less risk of snooping. Back in the day, Secret Chats received some praise from the EFF, but the fact that its standard system isn’t as secure earned it some criticism. If you’re looking for something that is considered more reliable by privacy advocates, then Signal is the EFF’s preferred platform, although that too is not without some caveats. Right now the digital security needs of Russians and Ukrainians are very different, and they lead to very different caveats about how to mitigate the risks associated with using Telegram. For Ukrainians in Ukraine, whose physical safety is at risk because they are in a war zone, digital security is probably not their highest priority. They may value access to news and communication with their loved ones over making sure that all of their communications are encrypted in such a manner that they are indecipherable to Telegram, its employees, or governments with court orders.
from vn
