Like with all hypocritical and subversive aspects of the establishment, the privileged, state operated "Antifascist" organizations such as 'Stand up to Racism', 'Unite against fascism', 'Hope not Hate' and so on exist exclusively to cause great harm to white people. Not one of these groups have ever confronted the actual issue of bigotry against white people, stemming from work quotas to media bias. They attack and discredit white people alone, making their entire existence as hypocritical and twisted as the governments they pretend to protest. From hate crime laws to the states migration policies, how can such groups claim to be against the very system that give them everything they want? They claim to be against bigotry but maintain the highest form of bigotry currently dominating our world.
Like with all hypocritical and subversive aspects of the establishment, the privileged, state operated "Antifascist" organizations such as 'Stand up to Racism', 'Unite against fascism', 'Hope not Hate' and so on exist exclusively to cause great harm to white people. Not one of these groups have ever confronted the actual issue of bigotry against white people, stemming from work quotas to media bias. They attack and discredit white people alone, making their entire existence as hypocritical and twisted as the governments they pretend to protest. From hate crime laws to the states migration policies, how can such groups claim to be against the very system that give them everything they want? They claim to be against bigotry but maintain the highest form of bigotry currently dominating our world.
BY Vinnie Sullivan
Warning: Undefined variable $i in /var/www/group-telegram/post.php on line 260
On February 27th, Durov posted that Channels were becoming a source of unverified information and that the company lacks the ability to check on their veracity. He urged users to be mistrustful of the things shared on Channels, and initially threatened to block the feature in the countries involved for the length of the war, saying that he didn’t want Telegram to be used to aggravate conflict or incite ethnic hatred. He did, however, walk back this plan when it became clear that they had also become a vital communications tool for Ukrainian officials and citizens to help coordinate their resistance and evacuations. After fleeing Russia, the brothers founded Telegram as a way to communicate outside the Kremlin's orbit. They now run it from Dubai, and Pavel Durov says it has more than 500 million monthly active users. For example, WhatsApp restricted the number of times a user could forward something, and developed automated systems that detect and flag objectionable content. Meanwhile, a completely redesigned attachment menu appears when sending multiple photos or vides. Users can tap "X selected" (X being the number of items) at the top of the panel to preview how the album will look in the chat when it's sent, as well as rearrange or remove selected media. Telegram has gained a reputation as the “secure” communications app in the post-Soviet states, but whenever you make choices about your digital security, it’s important to start by asking yourself, “What exactly am I securing? And who am I securing it from?” These questions should inform your decisions about whether you are using the right tool or platform for your digital security needs. Telegram is certainly not the most secure messaging app on the market right now. Its security model requires users to place a great deal of trust in Telegram’s ability to protect user data. For some users, this may be good enough for now. For others, it may be wiser to move to a different platform for certain kinds of high-risk communications.
from vn
