Депутаты внесли на рассмотрение Госдумы законопроект № 686463-8 "О внесении изменений в отдельные законодательные акты Российской Федерации" (в части повышения безопасности и антитеррористической защищенности объектов топливно-энергетического комплекса).
Документ освобождает сотрудников ведомственной охраны и ЧОП от ответственности за ущерб 3-м лицам, причиненный в результате защиты объектов ТЭК от воздействия беспилотников.
Каких-либо инструментов имущественной защиты пострадавших в этом случае лиц законопроект не предусматривает.
Депутаты внесли на рассмотрение Госдумы законопроект № 686463-8 "О внесении изменений в отдельные законодательные акты Российской Федерации" (в части повышения безопасности и антитеррористической защищенности объектов топливно-энергетического комплекса).
Документ освобождает сотрудников ведомственной охраны и ЧОП от ответственности за ущерб 3-м лицам, причиненный в результате защиты объектов ТЭК от воздействия беспилотников.
Каких-либо инструментов имущественной защиты пострадавших в этом случае лиц законопроект не предусматривает.
If you initiate a Secret Chat, however, then these communications are end-to-end encrypted and are tied to the device you are using. That means it’s less convenient to access them across multiple platforms, but you are at far less risk of snooping. Back in the day, Secret Chats received some praise from the EFF, but the fact that its standard system isn’t as secure earned it some criticism. If you’re looking for something that is considered more reliable by privacy advocates, then Signal is the EFF’s preferred platform, although that too is not without some caveats. Telegram has gained a reputation as the “secure” communications app in the post-Soviet states, but whenever you make choices about your digital security, it’s important to start by asking yourself, “What exactly am I securing? And who am I securing it from?” These questions should inform your decisions about whether you are using the right tool or platform for your digital security needs. Telegram is certainly not the most secure messaging app on the market right now. Its security model requires users to place a great deal of trust in Telegram’s ability to protect user data. For some users, this may be good enough for now. For others, it may be wiser to move to a different platform for certain kinds of high-risk communications. What distinguishes the app from competitors is its use of what's known as channels: Public or private feeds of photos and videos that can be set up by one person or an organization. The channels have become popular with on-the-ground journalists, aid workers and Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy, who broadcasts on a Telegram channel. The channels can be followed by an unlimited number of people. Unlike Facebook, Twitter and other popular social networks, there is no advertising on Telegram and the flow of information is not driven by an algorithm. The gold standard of encryption, known as end-to-end encryption, where only the sender and person who receives the message are able to see it, is available on Telegram only when the Secret Chat function is enabled. Voice and video calls are also completely encrypted. Additionally, investors are often instructed to deposit monies into personal bank accounts of individuals who claim to represent a legitimate entity, and/or into an unrelated corporate account. To lend credence and to lure unsuspecting victims, perpetrators usually claim that their entity and/or the investment schemes are approved by financial authorities.
from vn
