По дороге к папе сапсаны летят внахлёст, И отчаянный ветер пытается сбить с пути. По дороге к папе в тридевять сотен вёрст В королевстве, не сдавшем теперь ни одной версты. Размашистый ветер, ты сны мои не суропь. По дороге к папе мне снится твоя печаль И тихо-тихо: железнодорожная дробь, И папины руки, и неизвестная даль. Я завтра приеду и точно тебя обниму. Папочка. Папа. Папа. С тобой тепло. Ты Богу служил и, видно, пришёл к Нему. Теперь мы все вместе. Чертям назло.
По дороге к папе сапсаны летят внахлёст, И отчаянный ветер пытается сбить с пути. По дороге к папе в тридевять сотен вёрст В королевстве, не сдавшем теперь ни одной версты. Размашистый ветер, ты сны мои не суропь. По дороге к папе мне снится твоя печаль И тихо-тихо: железнодорожная дробь, И папины руки, и неизвестная даль. Я завтра приеду и точно тебя обниму. Папочка. Папа. Папа. С тобой тепло. Ты Богу служил и, видно, пришёл к Нему. Теперь мы все вместе. Чертям назло.
СПб-Рязань 22.2.24 (с)
BY Женская сторона войны
Warning: Undefined variable $i in /var/www/group-telegram/post.php on line 260
Telegram has gained a reputation as the “secure” communications app in the post-Soviet states, but whenever you make choices about your digital security, it’s important to start by asking yourself, “What exactly am I securing? And who am I securing it from?” These questions should inform your decisions about whether you are using the right tool or platform for your digital security needs. Telegram is certainly not the most secure messaging app on the market right now. Its security model requires users to place a great deal of trust in Telegram’s ability to protect user data. For some users, this may be good enough for now. For others, it may be wiser to move to a different platform for certain kinds of high-risk communications. If you initiate a Secret Chat, however, then these communications are end-to-end encrypted and are tied to the device you are using. That means it’s less convenient to access them across multiple platforms, but you are at far less risk of snooping. Back in the day, Secret Chats received some praise from the EFF, but the fact that its standard system isn’t as secure earned it some criticism. If you’re looking for something that is considered more reliable by privacy advocates, then Signal is the EFF’s preferred platform, although that too is not without some caveats. Given the pro-privacy stance of the platform, it’s taken as a given that it’ll be used for a number of reasons, not all of them good. And Telegram has been attached to a fair few scandals related to terrorism, sexual exploitation and crime. Back in 2015, Vox described Telegram as “ISIS’ app of choice,” saying that the platform’s real use is the ability to use channels to distribute material to large groups at once. Telegram has acted to remove public channels affiliated with terrorism, but Pavel Durov reiterated that he had no business snooping on private conversations. The War on Fakes channel has repeatedly attempted to push conspiracies that footage from Ukraine is somehow being falsified. One post on the channel from February 24 claimed without evidence that a widely viewed photo of a Ukrainian woman injured in an airstrike in the city of Chuhuiv was doctored and that the woman was seen in a different photo days later without injuries. The post, which has over 600,000 views, also baselessly claimed that the woman's blood was actually makeup or grape juice. Apparently upbeat developments in Russia's discussions with Ukraine helped at least temporarily send investors back into risk assets. Russian President Vladimir Putin said during a meeting with his Belarusian counterpart Alexander Lukashenko that there were "certain positive developments" occurring in the talks with Ukraine, according to a transcript of their meeting. Putin added that discussions were happening "almost on a daily basis."
from vn
