Если кто-то имеет право под угрозой насильственного принуждения требовать от людей денег на оплату предоставляемых им услуг, то у него нет ни малейшего смысла предоставлять эти услуги качественно и дёшево, т. е. эффективно, вместо того чтобы одну часть денег просто забрать себе, а другую пустить на усиление аппарата совершения насилия для снижения возможности людей избежать насильственного принуждения.
Если кто-то имеет право под угрозой насильственного принуждения требовать от людей денег на оплату предоставляемых им услуг, то у него нет ни малейшего смысла предоставлять эти услуги качественно и дёшево, т. е. эффективно, вместо того чтобы одну часть денег просто забрать себе, а другую пустить на усиление аппарата совершения насилия для снижения возможности людей избежать насильственного принуждения.
"For Telegram, accountability has always been a problem, which is why it was so popular even before the full-scale war with far-right extremists and terrorists from all over the world," she told AFP from her safe house outside the Ukrainian capital. The message was not authentic, with the real Zelenskiy soon denying the claim on his official Telegram channel, but the incident highlighted a major problem: disinformation quickly spreads unchecked on the encrypted app. Two days after Russia invaded Ukraine, an account on the Telegram messaging platform posing as President Volodymyr Zelenskiy urged his armed forces to surrender. Telegram has become more interventionist over time, and has steadily increased its efforts to shut down these accounts. But this has also meant that the company has also engaged with lawmakers more generally, although it maintains that it doesn’t do so willingly. For instance, in September 2021, Telegram reportedly blocked a chat bot in support of (Putin critic) Alexei Navalny during Russia’s most recent parliamentary elections. Pavel Durov was quoted at the time saying that the company was obliged to follow a “legitimate” law of the land. He added that as Apple and Google both follow the law, to violate it would give both platforms a reason to boot the messenger from its stores. As such, the SC would like to remind investors to always exercise caution when evaluating investment opportunities, especially those promising unrealistically high returns with little or no risk. Investors should also never deposit money into someone’s personal bank account if instructed.
from us
