4.12 6.01 ~7:00 Хельсинки— СПб 30.12 ~7:00 СПб— Хельсинки Поездки через Койдула на комфортабельном Audi Q7, до 4-х человек, также посылки и документы. 100€/место+ паром @Ige1711 #Хельсинки #Таллин #Псков #Спб
4.12 6.01 ~7:00 Хельсинки— СПб 30.12 ~7:00 СПб— Хельсинки Поездки через Койдула на комфортабельном Audi Q7, до 4-х человек, также посылки и документы. 100€/место+ паром @Ige1711 #Хельсинки #Таллин #Псков #Спб
BY На Псков! Авторский канал о поездках трансферах в СПб Москву Ригу Таллин и Псков. Граница Шумилкино- Luhamaa Koidula
Warning: Undefined variable $i in /var/www/group-telegram/post.php on line 260
Despite Telegram's origins, its approach to users' security has privacy advocates worried. A Russian Telegram channel with over 700,000 followers is spreading disinformation about Russia's invasion of Ukraine under the guise of providing "objective information" and fact-checking fake news. Its influence extends beyond the platform, with major Russian publications, government officials, and journalists citing the page's posts. The original Telegram channel has expanded into a web of accounts for different locations, including specific pages made for individual Russian cities. There's also an English-language website, which states it is owned by the people who run the Telegram channels. The gold standard of encryption, known as end-to-end encryption, where only the sender and person who receives the message are able to see it, is available on Telegram only when the Secret Chat function is enabled. Voice and video calls are also completely encrypted. Telegram has become more interventionist over time, and has steadily increased its efforts to shut down these accounts. But this has also meant that the company has also engaged with lawmakers more generally, although it maintains that it doesn’t do so willingly. For instance, in September 2021, Telegram reportedly blocked a chat bot in support of (Putin critic) Alexei Navalny during Russia’s most recent parliamentary elections. Pavel Durov was quoted at the time saying that the company was obliged to follow a “legitimate” law of the land. He added that as Apple and Google both follow the law, to violate it would give both platforms a reason to boot the messenger from its stores.
from us
