СРОЧНАЯ НОВОСТЬ! Идёт эвакуация гражданских лиц с южнокорейского острова Ёнпхёндо
Сегодня власти Ёнпхёндо получили от военных ЮжнойКореи сведения об опасной ситуации и возможной "провокации и ударе по Ёнпхёндо" военными Северной Кореи и в 12:02 объявили срочную эвакуацию жителей острова.
СРОЧНАЯ НОВОСТЬ! Идёт эвакуация гражданских лиц с южнокорейского острова Ёнпхёндо
Сегодня власти Ёнпхёндо получили от военных ЮжнойКореи сведения об опасной ситуации и возможной "провокации и ударе по Ёнпхёндо" военными Северной Кореи и в 12:02 объявили срочную эвакуацию жителей острова.
Groups are also not fully encrypted, end-to-end. This includes private groups. Private groups cannot be seen by other Telegram users, but Telegram itself can see the groups and all of the communications that you have in them. All of the same risks and warnings about channels can be applied to groups. Pavel Durov, a billionaire who embraces an all-black wardrobe and is often compared to the character Neo from "the Matrix," funds Telegram through his personal wealth and debt financing. And despite being one of the world's most popular tech companies, Telegram reportedly has only about 30 employees who defer to Durov for most major decisions about the platform. Given the pro-privacy stance of the platform, it’s taken as a given that it’ll be used for a number of reasons, not all of them good. And Telegram has been attached to a fair few scandals related to terrorism, sexual exploitation and crime. Back in 2015, Vox described Telegram as “ISIS’ app of choice,” saying that the platform’s real use is the ability to use channels to distribute material to large groups at once. Telegram has acted to remove public channels affiliated with terrorism, but Pavel Durov reiterated that he had no business snooping on private conversations. It is unclear who runs the account, although Russia's official Ministry of Foreign Affairs Twitter account promoted the Telegram channel on Saturday and claimed it was operated by "a group of experts & journalists." If you initiate a Secret Chat, however, then these communications are end-to-end encrypted and are tied to the device you are using. That means it’s less convenient to access them across multiple platforms, but you are at far less risk of snooping. Back in the day, Secret Chats received some praise from the EFF, but the fact that its standard system isn’t as secure earned it some criticism. If you’re looking for something that is considered more reliable by privacy advocates, then Signal is the EFF’s preferred platform, although that too is not without some caveats.
from us
