⚡️Секретарь Совета безопасности России Сергей Шойгу во время встречи с заместителем премьер-министра Афганистана Абдулом Гани Барадаром Ахундом заявил о планах исключить движение «Талибан» из черного списка России.
Афганский новостной портал Alemarah сообщил, что «решение принято для укрепления политических и экономических связей двух стран».
⚡️Секретарь Совета безопасности России Сергей Шойгу во время встречи с заместителем премьер-министра Афганистана Абдулом Гани Барадаром Ахундом заявил о планах исключить движение «Талибан» из черного списка России.
Афганский новостной портал Alemarah сообщил, что «решение принято для укрепления политических и экономических связей двух стран».
Stocks dropped on Friday afternoon, as gains made earlier in the day on hopes for diplomatic progress between Russia and Ukraine turned to losses. Technology stocks were hit particularly hard by higher bond yields. Telegram has gained a reputation as the “secure” communications app in the post-Soviet states, but whenever you make choices about your digital security, it’s important to start by asking yourself, “What exactly am I securing? And who am I securing it from?” These questions should inform your decisions about whether you are using the right tool or platform for your digital security needs. Telegram is certainly not the most secure messaging app on the market right now. Its security model requires users to place a great deal of trust in Telegram’s ability to protect user data. For some users, this may be good enough for now. For others, it may be wiser to move to a different platform for certain kinds of high-risk communications. You may recall that, back when Facebook started changing WhatsApp’s terms of service, a number of news outlets reported on, and even recommended, switching to Telegram. Pavel Durov even said that users should delete WhatsApp “unless you are cool with all of your photos and messages becoming public one day.” But Telegram can’t be described as a more-secure version of WhatsApp. Messages are not fully encrypted by default. That means the company could, in theory, access the content of the messages, or be forced to hand over the data at the request of a government. The War on Fakes channel has repeatedly attempted to push conspiracies that footage from Ukraine is somehow being falsified. One post on the channel from February 24 claimed without evidence that a widely viewed photo of a Ukrainian woman injured in an airstrike in the city of Chuhuiv was doctored and that the woman was seen in a different photo days later without injuries. The post, which has over 600,000 views, also baselessly claimed that the woman's blood was actually makeup or grape juice.
from us
