Рамиль Рахматчук теперь сертифицированный врунишка. Советский районный суд не даст соврать. За статью о фейках получил штраф в размере 200 тыс. рублей. Напомним, что во время баймакских событий "Пруфы" раскачивали политическую обстановку в республике, а потом много раз писали, что беспорядки готовил Белый Дом. В дни протестов, Рауфа Рахимчук и Ко вели себя как ЦИПСО. Это было большой ошибкой.
Рамиль Рахматчук теперь сертифицированный врунишка. Советский районный суд не даст соврать. За статью о фейках получил штраф в размере 200 тыс. рублей. Напомним, что во время баймакских событий "Пруфы" раскачивали политическую обстановку в республике, а потом много раз писали, что беспорядки готовил Белый Дом. В дни протестов, Рауфа Рахимчук и Ко вели себя как ЦИПСО. Это было большой ошибкой.
BY Рашит Ялалов
Warning: Undefined variable $i in /var/www/group-telegram/post.php on line 260
At this point, however, Durov had already been working on Telegram with his brother, and further planned a mobile-first social network with an explicit focus on anti-censorship. Later in April, he told TechCrunch that he had left Russia and had “no plans to go back,” saying that the nation was currently “incompatible with internet business at the moment.” He added later that he was looking for a country that matched his libertarian ideals to base his next startup. On December 23rd, 2020, Pavel Durov posted to his channel that the company would need to start generating revenue. In early 2021, he added that any advertising on the platform would not use user data for targeting, and that it would be focused on “large one-to-many channels.” He pledged that ads would be “non-intrusive” and that most users would simply not notice any change. In December 2021, Sebi officials had conducted a search and seizure operation at the premises of certain persons carrying out similar manipulative activities through Telegram channels. He said that since his platform does not have the capacity to check all channels, it may restrict some in Russia and Ukraine "for the duration of the conflict," but then reversed course hours later after many users complained that Telegram was an important source of information. Unlike Silicon Valley giants such as Facebook and Twitter, which run very public anti-disinformation programs, Brooking said: "Telegram is famously lax or absent in its content moderation policy."
from us
