Личинка чиновника начала окукливаться и через пару лет станет здоровой упитанной чиновничьей особью, очередным чиновничьим трутнем.
Тут, конечно, на лицо явная коррупция. Дружить семьями, это вам не просто так. Скоро он ещё и квартиру получит, как молодой и ооочень перспективный специалист.
Тем более, не забываем, скоро выборы мэра. А вот такие личинки в этом деле и на нужных должностях очень на руку действующей городской власти. Им ещё результаты выборов фальсифицировать.
Личинка чиновника начала окукливаться и через пару лет станет здоровой упитанной чиновничьей особью, очередным чиновничьим трутнем.
Тут, конечно, на лицо явная коррупция. Дружить семьями, это вам не просто так. Скоро он ещё и квартиру получит, как молодой и ооочень перспективный специалист.
Тем более, не забываем, скоро выборы мэра. А вот такие личинки в этом деле и на нужных должностях очень на руку действующей городской власти. Им ещё результаты выборов фальсифицировать.
Right now the digital security needs of Russians and Ukrainians are very different, and they lead to very different caveats about how to mitigate the risks associated with using Telegram. For Ukrainians in Ukraine, whose physical safety is at risk because they are in a war zone, digital security is probably not their highest priority. They may value access to news and communication with their loved ones over making sure that all of their communications are encrypted in such a manner that they are indecipherable to Telegram, its employees, or governments with court orders. If you initiate a Secret Chat, however, then these communications are end-to-end encrypted and are tied to the device you are using. That means it’s less convenient to access them across multiple platforms, but you are at far less risk of snooping. Back in the day, Secret Chats received some praise from the EFF, but the fact that its standard system isn’t as secure earned it some criticism. If you’re looking for something that is considered more reliable by privacy advocates, then Signal is the EFF’s preferred platform, although that too is not without some caveats. These entities are reportedly operating nine Telegram channels with more than five million subscribers to whom they were making recommendations on selected listed scrips. Such recommendations induced the investors to deal in the said scrips, thereby creating artificial volume and price rise. Multiple pro-Kremlin media figures circulated the post's false claims, including prominent Russian journalist Vladimir Soloviev and the state-controlled Russian outlet RT, according to the DFR Lab's report. Telegram has become more interventionist over time, and has steadily increased its efforts to shut down these accounts. But this has also meant that the company has also engaged with lawmakers more generally, although it maintains that it doesn’t do so willingly. For instance, in September 2021, Telegram reportedly blocked a chat bot in support of (Putin critic) Alexei Navalny during Russia’s most recent parliamentary elections. Pavel Durov was quoted at the time saying that the company was obliged to follow a “legitimate” law of the land. He added that as Apple and Google both follow the law, to violate it would give both platforms a reason to boot the messenger from its stores.
from ye
