С некоторых пор, мало что удивляет, однако, каждый раз когда The Guardian, вроде бы леволиберальная антиэстаблишмент газета (конечно же это ложь, но такой у них образ), горько переживает за западные спецслужбы, становится прямо неловко.
В статье "Trump’s return raises questions over future of CIA’s Russian recruitment drive" бывший московский корреспондент The Guardian Шон Волкер переживает за "бедных россиян", которых пошли работать на ЦРУ со времен начала войны. Мол, Трамп их чуть ли не сдаст России.
Ясно конечно, что никто никого не сдаст, но зачем вообще такие дурацкие статьи писать? Смех!
С некоторых пор, мало что удивляет, однако, каждый раз когда The Guardian, вроде бы леволиберальная антиэстаблишмент газета (конечно же это ложь, но такой у них образ), горько переживает за западные спецслужбы, становится прямо неловко.
В статье "Trump’s return raises questions over future of CIA’s Russian recruitment drive" бывший московский корреспондент The Guardian Шон Волкер переживает за "бедных россиян", которых пошли работать на ЦРУ со времен начала войны. Мол, Трамп их чуть ли не сдаст России.
Ясно конечно, что никто никого не сдаст, но зачем вообще такие дурацкие статьи писать? Смех!
Channels are not fully encrypted, end-to-end. All communications on a Telegram channel can be seen by anyone on the channel and are also visible to Telegram. Telegram may be asked by a government to hand over the communications from a channel. Telegram has a history of standing up to Russian government requests for data, but how comfortable you are relying on that history to predict future behavior is up to you. Because Telegram has this data, it may also be stolen by hackers or leaked by an internal employee. Right now the digital security needs of Russians and Ukrainians are very different, and they lead to very different caveats about how to mitigate the risks associated with using Telegram. For Ukrainians in Ukraine, whose physical safety is at risk because they are in a war zone, digital security is probably not their highest priority. They may value access to news and communication with their loved ones over making sure that all of their communications are encrypted in such a manner that they are indecipherable to Telegram, its employees, or governments with court orders. Groups are also not fully encrypted, end-to-end. This includes private groups. Private groups cannot be seen by other Telegram users, but Telegram itself can see the groups and all of the communications that you have in them. All of the same risks and warnings about channels can be applied to groups. "He has to start being more proactive and to find a real solution to this situation, not stay in standby without interfering. It's a very irresponsible position from the owner of Telegram," she said. Telegram has become more interventionist over time, and has steadily increased its efforts to shut down these accounts. But this has also meant that the company has also engaged with lawmakers more generally, although it maintains that it doesn’t do so willingly. For instance, in September 2021, Telegram reportedly blocked a chat bot in support of (Putin critic) Alexei Navalny during Russia’s most recent parliamentary elections. Pavel Durov was quoted at the time saying that the company was obliged to follow a “legitimate” law of the land. He added that as Apple and Google both follow the law, to violate it would give both platforms a reason to boot the messenger from its stores.
from ye
