Генерал-полковник Рустам Мурадов был назначен на должность заместителя Главнокомандующего сухопутными войсками МО РФ. Да, этот тот самый который отправлял ребят на штурм Угледара. Думал всплывает депутатом в каком нибудь из регионов, а нет, просто думал. 🤫
Генерал-полковник Рустам Мурадов был назначен на должность заместителя Главнокомандующего сухопутными войсками МО РФ. Да, этот тот самый который отправлял ребят на штурм Угледара. Думал всплывает депутатом в каком нибудь из регионов, а нет, просто думал. 🤫
BY 🇷🇺 DONTSTOPWAR
Warning: Undefined variable $i in /var/www/group-telegram/post.php on line 260
"We as Ukrainians believe that the truth is on our side, whether it's truth that you're proclaiming about the war and everything else, why would you want to hide it?," he said. On February 27th, Durov posted that Channels were becoming a source of unverified information and that the company lacks the ability to check on their veracity. He urged users to be mistrustful of the things shared on Channels, and initially threatened to block the feature in the countries involved for the length of the war, saying that he didn’t want Telegram to be used to aggravate conflict or incite ethnic hatred. He did, however, walk back this plan when it became clear that they had also become a vital communications tool for Ukrainian officials and citizens to help coordinate their resistance and evacuations. The next bit isn’t clear, but Durov reportedly claimed that his resignation, dated March 21st, was an April Fools’ prank. TechCrunch implies that it was a matter of principle, but it’s hard to be clear on the wheres, whos and whys. Similarly, on April 17th, the Moscow Times quoted Durov as saying that he quit the company after being pressured to reveal account details about Ukrainians protesting the then-president Viktor Yanukovych. Emerson Brooking, a disinformation expert at the Atlantic Council's Digital Forensic Research Lab, said: "Back in the Wild West period of content moderation, like 2014 or 2015, maybe they could have gotten away with it, but it stands in marked contrast with how other companies run themselves today." Telegram, which does little policing of its content, has also became a hub for Russian propaganda and misinformation. Many pro-Kremlin channels have become popular, alongside accounts of journalists and other independent observers.
from ye
