Р. Кадыров, что бы про него ни говорили - единственный гарант лояльности Чечни в текущем моменте. Не будем обсуждать, почему так получилось и по чьей вине. Но, если вдруг с ним что-то произойдет, перехватить контроль за Республикой у федералов вряд ли получится. Федерального компонента в ЧР практически нет. Как минимум, можно ожидать замеса в стиле "все против всех"...
Р. Кадыров, что бы про него ни говорили - единственный гарант лояльности Чечни в текущем моменте. Не будем обсуждать, почему так получилось и по чьей вине. Но, если вдруг с ним что-то произойдет, перехватить контроль за Республикой у федералов вряд ли получится. Федерального компонента в ЧР практически нет. Как минимум, можно ожидать замеса в стиле "все против всех"...
BY ДВУГЛАВ
Warning: Undefined variable $i in /var/www/group-telegram/post.php on line 260
Anastasia Vlasova/Getty Images Given the pro-privacy stance of the platform, it’s taken as a given that it’ll be used for a number of reasons, not all of them good. And Telegram has been attached to a fair few scandals related to terrorism, sexual exploitation and crime. Back in 2015, Vox described Telegram as “ISIS’ app of choice,” saying that the platform’s real use is the ability to use channels to distribute material to large groups at once. Telegram has acted to remove public channels affiliated with terrorism, but Pavel Durov reiterated that he had no business snooping on private conversations. So, uh, whenever I hear about Telegram, it’s always in relation to something bad. What gives? The War on Fakes channel has repeatedly attempted to push conspiracies that footage from Ukraine is somehow being falsified. One post on the channel from February 24 claimed without evidence that a widely viewed photo of a Ukrainian woman injured in an airstrike in the city of Chuhuiv was doctored and that the woman was seen in a different photo days later without injuries. The post, which has over 600,000 views, also baselessly claimed that the woman's blood was actually makeup or grape juice. The picture was mixed overseas. Hong Kong’s Hang Seng Index fell 1.6%, under pressure from U.S. regulatory scrutiny on New York-listed Chinese companies. Stocks were more buoyant in Europe, where Frankfurt’s DAX surged 1.4%.
from ye
