КПРФ, которую Развожаев и Турчак заранее списывают с губернаторской гонки в Севастополе, лишая депутатских мандатов проводников ее муниципального фильтра, – это, как мы писали, постхакасский синдром поражения-2018 Развожаева, а еще – страшный сон врио, когда комми-демоническая – красная машина «Кристина» из кошмаромана Кинга преследует Развожаева, чтобы снова и снова раздавить. // Крымский канал
КПРФ, которую Развожаев и Турчак заранее списывают с губернаторской гонки в Севастополе, лишая депутатских мандатов проводников ее муниципального фильтра, – это, как мы писали, постхакасский синдром поражения-2018 Развожаева, а еще – страшный сон врио, когда комми-демоническая – красная машина «Кристина» из кошмаромана Кинга преследует Развожаева, чтобы снова и снова раздавить. // Крымский канал
BY Крымский канал
Warning: Undefined variable $i in /var/www/group-telegram/post.php on line 260
You may recall that, back when Facebook started changing WhatsApp’s terms of service, a number of news outlets reported on, and even recommended, switching to Telegram. Pavel Durov even said that users should delete WhatsApp “unless you are cool with all of your photos and messages becoming public one day.” But Telegram can’t be described as a more-secure version of WhatsApp. On February 27th, Durov posted that Channels were becoming a source of unverified information and that the company lacks the ability to check on their veracity. He urged users to be mistrustful of the things shared on Channels, and initially threatened to block the feature in the countries involved for the length of the war, saying that he didn’t want Telegram to be used to aggravate conflict or incite ethnic hatred. He did, however, walk back this plan when it became clear that they had also become a vital communications tool for Ukrainian officials and citizens to help coordinate their resistance and evacuations. Oleksandra Matviichuk, a Kyiv-based lawyer and head of the Center for Civil Liberties, called Durov’s position "very weak," and urged concrete improvements. Groups are also not fully encrypted, end-to-end. This includes private groups. Private groups cannot be seen by other Telegram users, but Telegram itself can see the groups and all of the communications that you have in them. All of the same risks and warnings about channels can be applied to groups.
from ye
