😡 Ситуация с цензурой продолжает оставаться напряженной. Письма пропадают, сроки проверки превышают положенные 3 дня, появились печати на бланках и вымарываются вполне безобидные вещи.
❌ Также Даниил пишет, что часть письма, не прошедшая цензуру, вернулась к нему на...переписывание. Ранее о таком нововведении сообщала группа поддержки Артема Камардина "Маяковское Дело".
⚡️Огромная просьба к тем, кто столкнулся с такими же "новинками" от цензоров Матросской Тишины в переписке с Даниилом и другими ребятами, написать нам в бот @FreeDaniilKlyuka_bot
😡 Ситуация с цензурой продолжает оставаться напряженной. Письма пропадают, сроки проверки превышают положенные 3 дня, появились печати на бланках и вымарываются вполне безобидные вещи.
❌ Также Даниил пишет, что часть письма, не прошедшая цензуру, вернулась к нему на...переписывание. Ранее о таком нововведении сообщала группа поддержки Артема Камардина "Маяковское Дело".
⚡️Огромная просьба к тем, кто столкнулся с такими же "новинками" от цензоров Матросской Тишины в переписке с Даниилом и другими ребятами, написать нам в бот @FreeDaniilKlyuka_bot
Emerson Brooking, a disinformation expert at the Atlantic Council's Digital Forensic Research Lab, said: "Back in the Wild West period of content moderation, like 2014 or 2015, maybe they could have gotten away with it, but it stands in marked contrast with how other companies run themselves today." Telegram has become more interventionist over time, and has steadily increased its efforts to shut down these accounts. But this has also meant that the company has also engaged with lawmakers more generally, although it maintains that it doesn’t do so willingly. For instance, in September 2021, Telegram reportedly blocked a chat bot in support of (Putin critic) Alexei Navalny during Russia’s most recent parliamentary elections. Pavel Durov was quoted at the time saying that the company was obliged to follow a “legitimate” law of the land. He added that as Apple and Google both follow the law, to violate it would give both platforms a reason to boot the messenger from its stores. Channels are not fully encrypted, end-to-end. All communications on a Telegram channel can be seen by anyone on the channel and are also visible to Telegram. Telegram may be asked by a government to hand over the communications from a channel. Telegram has a history of standing up to Russian government requests for data, but how comfortable you are relying on that history to predict future behavior is up to you. Because Telegram has this data, it may also be stolen by hackers or leaked by an internal employee. Russians and Ukrainians are both prolific users of Telegram. They rely on the app for channels that act as newsfeeds, group chats (both public and private), and one-to-one communication. Since the Russian invasion of Ukraine, Telegram has remained an important lifeline for both Russians and Ukrainians, as a way of staying aware of the latest news and keeping in touch with loved ones. At its heart, Telegram is little more than a messaging app like WhatsApp or Signal. But it also offers open channels that enable a single user, or a group of users, to communicate with large numbers in a method similar to a Twitter account. This has proven to be both a blessing and a curse for Telegram and its users, since these channels can be used for both good and ill. Right now, as Wired reports, the app is a key way for Ukrainians to receive updates from the government during the invasion.
from ye