каж3тся, чт0 за т0б0й сл3дят? правит3льств0 вживил0 чип т3б3 в к0жу? близки3 чт0-т0 н3 д0г0варивают и пытаются скрыть правду?
бро, да ты ебанный параноик, вэлком ту ::
➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖ ➖➖➖🌟➖➖➖➖➖➖
здесь вы можете поделиться своими мыслями и переживаниями, вызванными паранойей; рассказать шизо-теорию, в которую не верят друзья; найти поддержку и понимание.
каж3тся, чт0 за т0б0й сл3дят? правит3льств0 вживил0 чип т3б3 в к0жу? близки3 чт0-т0 н3 д0г0варивают и пытаются скрыть правду?
бро, да ты ебанный параноик, вэлком ту ::
➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖ ➖➖➖🌟➖➖➖➖➖➖
здесь вы можете поделиться своими мыслями и переживаниями, вызванными паранойей; рассказать шизо-теорию, в которую не верят друзья; найти поддержку и понимание.
On February 27th, Durov posted that Channels were becoming a source of unverified information and that the company lacks the ability to check on their veracity. He urged users to be mistrustful of the things shared on Channels, and initially threatened to block the feature in the countries involved for the length of the war, saying that he didn’t want Telegram to be used to aggravate conflict or incite ethnic hatred. He did, however, walk back this plan when it became clear that they had also become a vital communications tool for Ukrainian officials and citizens to help coordinate their resistance and evacuations. "And that set off kind of a battle royale for control of the platform that Durov eventually lost," said Nathalie Maréchal of the Washington advocacy group Ranking Digital Rights. The next bit isn’t clear, but Durov reportedly claimed that his resignation, dated March 21st, was an April Fools’ prank. TechCrunch implies that it was a matter of principle, but it’s hard to be clear on the wheres, whos and whys. Similarly, on April 17th, the Moscow Times quoted Durov as saying that he quit the company after being pressured to reveal account details about Ukrainians protesting the then-president Viktor Yanukovych. The Securities and Exchange Board of India (Sebi) had carried out a similar exercise in 2017 in a matter related to circulation of messages through WhatsApp. Given the pro-privacy stance of the platform, it’s taken as a given that it’ll be used for a number of reasons, not all of them good. And Telegram has been attached to a fair few scandals related to terrorism, sexual exploitation and crime. Back in 2015, Vox described Telegram as “ISIS’ app of choice,” saying that the platform’s real use is the ability to use channels to distribute material to large groups at once. Telegram has acted to remove public channels affiliated with terrorism, but Pavel Durov reiterated that he had no business snooping on private conversations.
from ye
