Вы серьезно считаете, что человек, который на праймериз в Заксобрание набрал 118 голосов может быть занозой? Это просто как назойливая муха, которая жужжит и не приносит никакого вреда.
А вот репутационные потери, которые несет Павел, превратившись из неплохого журналиста в клоуна - куда серьезнее вопрос.
Вы серьезно считаете, что человек, который на праймериз в Заксобрание набрал 118 голосов может быть занозой? Это просто как назойливая муха, которая жужжит и не приносит никакого вреда.
А вот репутационные потери, которые несет Павел, превратившись из неплохого журналиста в клоуна - куда серьезнее вопрос.
Despite Telegram's origins, its approach to users' security has privacy advocates worried. Emerson Brooking, a disinformation expert at the Atlantic Council's Digital Forensic Research Lab, said: "Back in the Wild West period of content moderation, like 2014 or 2015, maybe they could have gotten away with it, but it stands in marked contrast with how other companies run themselves today." Telegram, which does little policing of its content, has also became a hub for Russian propaganda and misinformation. Many pro-Kremlin channels have become popular, alongside accounts of journalists and other independent observers. Lastly, the web previews of t.me links have been given a new look, adding chat backgrounds and design elements from the fully-features Telegram Web client. If you initiate a Secret Chat, however, then these communications are end-to-end encrypted and are tied to the device you are using. That means it’s less convenient to access them across multiple platforms, but you are at far less risk of snooping. Back in the day, Secret Chats received some praise from the EFF, but the fact that its standard system isn’t as secure earned it some criticism. If you’re looking for something that is considered more reliable by privacy advocates, then Signal is the EFF’s preferred platform, although that too is not without some caveats.
from ye
