Habt ihr euch auch gefragt, was für ein Rosenkrieg da zwischen der »Vierteljahresschrift für Konsensstörung« und der Schwaerzel-Gang gerade ausgetragen wird? Wir haben nachgefragt – und versuchen nun, die Fäden zu entwirren.
Habt ihr euch auch gefragt, was für ein Rosenkrieg da zwischen der »Vierteljahresschrift für Konsensstörung« und der Schwaerzel-Gang gerade ausgetragen wird? Wir haben nachgefragt – und versuchen nun, die Fäden zu entwirren.
The last couple days have exemplified that uncertainty. On Thursday, news emerged that talks in Turkey between the Russia and Ukraine yielded no positive result. But on Friday, Reuters reported that Russian President Vladimir Putin said there had been some “positive shifts” in talks between the two sides. Given the pro-privacy stance of the platform, it’s taken as a given that it’ll be used for a number of reasons, not all of them good. And Telegram has been attached to a fair few scandals related to terrorism, sexual exploitation and crime. Back in 2015, Vox described Telegram as “ISIS’ app of choice,” saying that the platform’s real use is the ability to use channels to distribute material to large groups at once. Telegram has acted to remove public channels affiliated with terrorism, but Pavel Durov reiterated that he had no business snooping on private conversations. Oleksandra Matviichuk, a Kyiv-based lawyer and head of the Center for Civil Liberties, called Durov’s position "very weak," and urged concrete improvements. In the past, it was noticed that through bulk SMSes, investors were induced to invest in or purchase the stocks of certain listed companies. "The result is on this photo: fiery 'greetings' to the invaders," the Security Service of Ukraine wrote alongside a photo showing several military vehicles among plumes of black smoke.
from ye
