✅Также, как и более 2 миллионов мальков рыб, которых выпустили в 2024 году в водоемы Забайкалья.
💦Работы по искусственному воспроизводству водных биоресурсов выполнены на реках Онон, Ингода, Хилок, Чикой, Чара, а также озерах Иван и Шакша.
🐟 В общей сложности в эти водные объекты выпустили 1,4 миллиона мальков сазана, 326 тысяч штук молоди хариусов, 303 тысячи – пеляди, 94 тысячи – осетровых.
✅Также, как и более 2 миллионов мальков рыб, которых выпустили в 2024 году в водоемы Забайкалья.
💦Работы по искусственному воспроизводству водных биоресурсов выполнены на реках Онон, Ингода, Хилок, Чикой, Чара, а также озерах Иван и Шакша.
🐟 В общей сложности в эти водные объекты выпустили 1,4 миллиона мальков сазана, 326 тысяч штук молоди хариусов, 303 тысячи – пеляди, 94 тысячи – осетровых.
#ДальнийВосток #МЕМнистерство #ДФО
BY МЕМнистерство Дальневосточных Дел
Warning: Undefined variable $i in /var/www/group-telegram/post.php on line 260
Right now the digital security needs of Russians and Ukrainians are very different, and they lead to very different caveats about how to mitigate the risks associated with using Telegram. For Ukrainians in Ukraine, whose physical safety is at risk because they are in a war zone, digital security is probably not their highest priority. They may value access to news and communication with their loved ones over making sure that all of their communications are encrypted in such a manner that they are indecipherable to Telegram, its employees, or governments with court orders. If you initiate a Secret Chat, however, then these communications are end-to-end encrypted and are tied to the device you are using. That means it’s less convenient to access them across multiple platforms, but you are at far less risk of snooping. Back in the day, Secret Chats received some praise from the EFF, but the fact that its standard system isn’t as secure earned it some criticism. If you’re looking for something that is considered more reliable by privacy advocates, then Signal is the EFF’s preferred platform, although that too is not without some caveats. The War on Fakes channel has repeatedly attempted to push conspiracies that footage from Ukraine is somehow being falsified. One post on the channel from February 24 claimed without evidence that a widely viewed photo of a Ukrainian woman injured in an airstrike in the city of Chuhuiv was doctored and that the woman was seen in a different photo days later without injuries. The post, which has over 600,000 views, also baselessly claimed that the woman's blood was actually makeup or grape juice. "And that set off kind of a battle royale for control of the platform that Durov eventually lost," said Nathalie Maréchal of the Washington advocacy group Ranking Digital Rights. The next bit isn’t clear, but Durov reportedly claimed that his resignation, dated March 21st, was an April Fools’ prank. TechCrunch implies that it was a matter of principle, but it’s hard to be clear on the wheres, whos and whys. Similarly, on April 17th, the Moscow Times quoted Durov as saying that he quit the company after being pressured to reveal account details about Ukrainians protesting the then-president Viktor Yanukovych.
from ye
