Ну вы серьезно так хотите продолжать жить?! Вы представляете себе, что это возможно? Я нет. Это невозможно. И этого не будет. У меня нет полномочий, причем никаких, повлиять на это. Эти полномочия сегодня есть лишь у Бога. И он до вас доберется.
Ну вы серьезно так хотите продолжать жить?! Вы представляете себе, что это возможно? Я нет. Это невозможно. И этого не будет. У меня нет полномочий, причем никаких, повлиять на это. Эти полномочия сегодня есть лишь у Бога. И он до вас доберется.
You may recall that, back when Facebook started changing WhatsApp’s terms of service, a number of news outlets reported on, and even recommended, switching to Telegram. Pavel Durov even said that users should delete WhatsApp “unless you are cool with all of your photos and messages becoming public one day.” But Telegram can’t be described as a more-secure version of WhatsApp. Since its launch in 2013, Telegram has grown from a simple messaging app to a broadcast network. Its user base isn’t as vast as WhatsApp’s, and its broadcast platform is a fraction the size of Twitter, but it’s nonetheless showing its use. While Telegram has been embroiled in controversy for much of its life, it has become a vital source of communication during the invasion of Ukraine. But, if all of this is new to you, let us explain, dear friends, what on Earth a Telegram is meant to be, and why you should, or should not, need to care. "He has to start being more proactive and to find a real solution to this situation, not stay in standby without interfering. It's a very irresponsible position from the owner of Telegram," she said. Despite Telegram's origins, its approach to users' security has privacy advocates worried. Emerson Brooking, a disinformation expert at the Atlantic Council's Digital Forensic Research Lab, said: "Back in the Wild West period of content moderation, like 2014 or 2015, maybe they could have gotten away with it, but it stands in marked contrast with how other companies run themselves today."
from ye
