Яблочный навальненыш словно пациент из котенко обвинил Жеку-мэра в заказном аресте полицией. Надо было брать выше и обвинить в своем аресте Путина. Тогда можно было бы подать на полит.убежище.
Яблочный навальненыш словно пациент из котенко обвинил Жеку-мэра в заказном аресте полицией. Надо было брать выше и обвинить в своем аресте Путина. Тогда можно было бы подать на полит.убежище.
BY Открытая социология Саха
Warning: Undefined variable $i in /var/www/group-telegram/post.php on line 260
He floated the idea of restricting the use of Telegram in Ukraine and Russia, a suggestion that was met with fierce opposition from users. Shortly after, Durov backed off the idea. A Russian Telegram channel with over 700,000 followers is spreading disinformation about Russia's invasion of Ukraine under the guise of providing "objective information" and fact-checking fake news. Its influence extends beyond the platform, with major Russian publications, government officials, and journalists citing the page's posts. For Oleksandra Tsekhanovska, head of the Hybrid Warfare Analytical Group at the Kyiv-based Ukraine Crisis Media Center, the effects are both near- and far-reaching. Anastasia Vlasova/Getty Images Telegram has become more interventionist over time, and has steadily increased its efforts to shut down these accounts. But this has also meant that the company has also engaged with lawmakers more generally, although it maintains that it doesn’t do so willingly. For instance, in September 2021, Telegram reportedly blocked a chat bot in support of (Putin critic) Alexei Navalny during Russia’s most recent parliamentary elections. Pavel Durov was quoted at the time saying that the company was obliged to follow a “legitimate” law of the land. He added that as Apple and Google both follow the law, to violate it would give both platforms a reason to boot the messenger from its stores.
from ye
