🇷🇺Делегация Краснодара приняла участие в священной литургии по случаю Дня города Восточное Сараево
Её провёл епископ Сербской православной церкви, митрополит Дабробосанский Хризостом вместе с краснодарским священнослужителем иереем Евгением Игнатовым.
Богослужение состоялось в церкви Святого Петра Дабробосанского в пригороде Восточного Сараева. Затем прошёл крестный ход.
🇷🇺Делегация Краснодара приняла участие в священной литургии по случаю Дня города Восточное Сараево
Её провёл епископ Сербской православной церкви, митрополит Дабробосанский Хризостом вместе с краснодарским священнослужителем иереем Евгением Игнатовым.
Богослужение состоялось в церкви Святого Петра Дабробосанского в пригороде Восточного Сараева. Затем прошёл крестный ход.
At its heart, Telegram is little more than a messaging app like WhatsApp or Signal. But it also offers open channels that enable a single user, or a group of users, to communicate with large numbers in a method similar to a Twitter account. This has proven to be both a blessing and a curse for Telegram and its users, since these channels can be used for both good and ill. Right now, as Wired reports, the app is a key way for Ukrainians to receive updates from the government during the invasion. In addition, Telegram now supports the use of third-party streaming tools like OBS Studio and XSplit to broadcast live video, allowing users to add overlays and multi-screen layouts for a more professional look. Individual messages can be fully encrypted. But the user has to turn on that function. It's not automatic, as it is on Signal and WhatsApp. On February 27th, Durov posted that Channels were becoming a source of unverified information and that the company lacks the ability to check on their veracity. He urged users to be mistrustful of the things shared on Channels, and initially threatened to block the feature in the countries involved for the length of the war, saying that he didn’t want Telegram to be used to aggravate conflict or incite ethnic hatred. He did, however, walk back this plan when it became clear that they had also become a vital communications tool for Ukrainian officials and citizens to help coordinate their resistance and evacuations. If you initiate a Secret Chat, however, then these communications are end-to-end encrypted and are tied to the device you are using. That means it’s less convenient to access them across multiple platforms, but you are at far less risk of snooping. Back in the day, Secret Chats received some praise from the EFF, but the fact that its standard system isn’t as secure earned it some criticism. If you’re looking for something that is considered more reliable by privacy advocates, then Signal is the EFF’s preferred platform, although that too is not without some caveats.
from ye
