«Россия поставила в Индию нефти и нефтепродуктов в первом полугодии на $30 млрд, а наш импорт из Индии оценивается примерно в $6-7 млрд в год. Нам нечего покупать в Индии, но мы не можем эти рупии вернуть, поскольку рупия — неконвертируемая валюта. $30 млрд за полгода — больше, чем все положительное сальдо текущего счета», — написал Задорнов в колонке для РБК о причинах ослабления рубля. По его мнению, вопрос с рупиями — «непростая задача, но российское правительство и ЦБ обязаны ее решить».
«Россия поставила в Индию нефти и нефтепродуктов в первом полугодии на $30 млрд, а наш импорт из Индии оценивается примерно в $6-7 млрд в год. Нам нечего покупать в Индии, но мы не можем эти рупии вернуть, поскольку рупия — неконвертируемая валюта. $30 млрд за полгода — больше, чем все положительное сальдо текущего счета», — написал Задорнов в колонке для РБК о причинах ослабления рубля. По его мнению, вопрос с рупиями — «непростая задача, но российское правительство и ЦБ обязаны ее решить».
"There are several million Russians who can lift their head up from propaganda and try to look for other sources, and I'd say that most look for it on Telegram," he said. Messages are not fully encrypted by default. That means the company could, in theory, access the content of the messages, or be forced to hand over the data at the request of a government. Given the pro-privacy stance of the platform, it’s taken as a given that it’ll be used for a number of reasons, not all of them good. And Telegram has been attached to a fair few scandals related to terrorism, sexual exploitation and crime. Back in 2015, Vox described Telegram as “ISIS’ app of choice,” saying that the platform’s real use is the ability to use channels to distribute material to large groups at once. Telegram has acted to remove public channels affiliated with terrorism, but Pavel Durov reiterated that he had no business snooping on private conversations. "There are a lot of things that Telegram could have been doing this whole time. And they know exactly what they are and they've chosen not to do them. That's why I don't trust them," she said. Telegram has become more interventionist over time, and has steadily increased its efforts to shut down these accounts. But this has also meant that the company has also engaged with lawmakers more generally, although it maintains that it doesn’t do so willingly. For instance, in September 2021, Telegram reportedly blocked a chat bot in support of (Putin critic) Alexei Navalny during Russia’s most recent parliamentary elections. Pavel Durov was quoted at the time saying that the company was obliged to follow a “legitimate” law of the land. He added that as Apple and Google both follow the law, to violate it would give both platforms a reason to boot the messenger from its stores.
from ye
