❗️ВС РФ пресекли попытки прорыва мобильных групп ВСУ на бронетехнике вглубь российской территории в районах Толпино, Журавлей и Общего Колодезя — Минобороны РФ
Помимо этого, в военном ведомстве сообщили, что ВС РФ также пресекли попытку прорыва ВСУ в Беловский район Курской области.
❗️ВС РФ пресекли попытки прорыва мобильных групп ВСУ на бронетехнике вглубь российской территории в районах Толпино, Журавлей и Общего Колодезя — Минобороны РФ
Помимо этого, в военном ведомстве сообщили, что ВС РФ также пресекли попытку прорыва ВСУ в Беловский район Курской области.
BY Readovka
Warning: Undefined variable $i in /var/www/group-telegram/post.php on line 260
In February 2014, the Ukrainian people ousted pro-Russian president Viktor Yanukovych, prompting Russia to invade and annex the Crimean peninsula. By the start of April, Pavel Durov had given his notice, with TechCrunch saying at the time that the CEO had resisted pressure to suppress pages criticizing the Russian government. You may recall that, back when Facebook started changing WhatsApp’s terms of service, a number of news outlets reported on, and even recommended, switching to Telegram. Pavel Durov even said that users should delete WhatsApp “unless you are cool with all of your photos and messages becoming public one day.” But Telegram can’t be described as a more-secure version of WhatsApp. Russians and Ukrainians are both prolific users of Telegram. They rely on the app for channels that act as newsfeeds, group chats (both public and private), and one-to-one communication. Since the Russian invasion of Ukraine, Telegram has remained an important lifeline for both Russians and Ukrainians, as a way of staying aware of the latest news and keeping in touch with loved ones. Either way, Durov says that he withdrew his resignation but that he was ousted from his company anyway. Subsequently, control of the company was reportedly handed to oligarchs Alisher Usmanov and Igor Sechin, both allegedly close associates of Russian leader Vladimir Putin. Right now the digital security needs of Russians and Ukrainians are very different, and they lead to very different caveats about how to mitigate the risks associated with using Telegram. For Ukrainians in Ukraine, whose physical safety is at risk because they are in a war zone, digital security is probably not their highest priority. They may value access to news and communication with their loved ones over making sure that all of their communications are encrypted in such a manner that they are indecipherable to Telegram, its employees, or governments with court orders.
from ye