В преддверии релиза второго номера «Фронды» мы запускаем серию ежемесячных мероприятий. Первое — дискуссия с экспертами Центра республиканских исследований о политической философии в эпоху конфликтов и нестабильности: Родионом Бельковичем, Андреем Быстровым, Сергеем Виноградовым и Владимиром Чураковым.
В преддверии релиза второго номера «Фронды» мы запускаем серию ежемесячных мероприятий. Первое — дискуссия с экспертами Центра республиканских исследований о политической философии в эпоху конфликтов и нестабильности: Родионом Бельковичем, Андреем Быстровым, Сергеем Виноградовым и Владимиром Чураковым.
The message was not authentic, with the real Zelenskiy soon denying the claim on his official Telegram channel, but the incident highlighted a major problem: disinformation quickly spreads unchecked on the encrypted app. Just days after Russia invaded Ukraine, Durov wrote that Telegram was "increasingly becoming a source of unverified information," and he worried about the app being used to "incite ethnic hatred." So, uh, whenever I hear about Telegram, it’s always in relation to something bad. What gives? On February 27th, Durov posted that Channels were becoming a source of unverified information and that the company lacks the ability to check on their veracity. He urged users to be mistrustful of the things shared on Channels, and initially threatened to block the feature in the countries involved for the length of the war, saying that he didn’t want Telegram to be used to aggravate conflict or incite ethnic hatred. He did, however, walk back this plan when it became clear that they had also become a vital communications tool for Ukrainian officials and citizens to help coordinate their resistance and evacuations. In addition, Telegram's architecture limits the ability to slow the spread of false information: the lack of a central public feed, and the fact that comments are easily disabled in channels, reduce the space for public pushback.
from ye
