Арбитражный суд г.Москвы по заявлению банка «Открытие» арестовал 5% акций «Детского мира», принадлежащих Goldman Sachs.
Обеспечительные меры наложены в рамках требований о взыскании задолженности на сумму более 614 млн. рублей.
Суд постановил арестовать 5%-ный пакет акций «Детского мира», пакеты акций российских компаний, принадлежащих фонду Goldman Sachs III SICAV, а также имущественные права Goldman Sachs & Co в отношении товарных знаков.
Ответчиками по иску выступают Goldman Sachs International, Goldman Sachs Group и Goldman Sachs & Co LLC.
Goldman Sachs International отказался исполнять обязательства по генеральному соглашению, ссылаясь на то, что банк «Открытие» попал под санкции Великобритании и США. @ruarbitr
Арбитражный суд г.Москвы по заявлению банка «Открытие» арестовал 5% акций «Детского мира», принадлежащих Goldman Sachs.
Обеспечительные меры наложены в рамках требований о взыскании задолженности на сумму более 614 млн. рублей.
Суд постановил арестовать 5%-ный пакет акций «Детского мира», пакеты акций российских компаний, принадлежащих фонду Goldman Sachs III SICAV, а также имущественные права Goldman Sachs & Co в отношении товарных знаков.
Ответчиками по иску выступают Goldman Sachs International, Goldman Sachs Group и Goldman Sachs & Co LLC.
Goldman Sachs International отказался исполнять обязательства по генеральному соглашению, ссылаясь на то, что банк «Открытие» попал под санкции Великобритании и США. @ruarbitr
BY Арбитр.
Warning: Undefined variable $i in /var/www/group-telegram/post.php on line 260
Right now the digital security needs of Russians and Ukrainians are very different, and they lead to very different caveats about how to mitigate the risks associated with using Telegram. For Ukrainians in Ukraine, whose physical safety is at risk because they are in a war zone, digital security is probably not their highest priority. They may value access to news and communication with their loved ones over making sure that all of their communications are encrypted in such a manner that they are indecipherable to Telegram, its employees, or governments with court orders. For example, WhatsApp restricted the number of times a user could forward something, and developed automated systems that detect and flag objectionable content. But the Ukraine Crisis Media Center's Tsekhanovska points out that communications are often down in zones most affected by the war, making this sort of cross-referencing a luxury many cannot afford. If you initiate a Secret Chat, however, then these communications are end-to-end encrypted and are tied to the device you are using. That means it’s less convenient to access them across multiple platforms, but you are at far less risk of snooping. Back in the day, Secret Chats received some praise from the EFF, but the fact that its standard system isn’t as secure earned it some criticism. If you’re looking for something that is considered more reliable by privacy advocates, then Signal is the EFF’s preferred platform, although that too is not without some caveats. The War on Fakes channel has repeatedly attempted to push conspiracies that footage from Ukraine is somehow being falsified. One post on the channel from February 24 claimed without evidence that a widely viewed photo of a Ukrainian woman injured in an airstrike in the city of Chuhuiv was doctored and that the woman was seen in a different photo days later without injuries. The post, which has over 600,000 views, also baselessly claimed that the woman's blood was actually makeup or grape juice.
from ye
