Ещё трофеи с завода. Если верить российским военкорам, что, конечно, глупость априори, и «доблестные» защитники завода благополучно вышли, забрать с собой они забыли не только военные билеты, но и рации! Видимо, слишком сильно торопились. Но, возможно, они просто не ушли с Агрегатного Завода, а остались там навсегда? Давайте спросим отечественных военкоров!
Ещё трофеи с завода. Если верить российским военкорам, что, конечно, глупость априори, и «доблестные» защитники завода благополучно вышли, забрать с собой они забыли не только военные билеты, но и рации! Видимо, слишком сильно торопились. Но, возможно, они просто не ушли с Агрегатного Завода, а остались там навсегда? Давайте спросим отечественных военкоров!
"There are a lot of things that Telegram could have been doing this whole time. And they know exactly what they are and they've chosen not to do them. That's why I don't trust them," she said. "Someone posing as a Ukrainian citizen just joins the chat and starts spreading misinformation, or gathers data, like the location of shelters," Tsekhanovska said, noting how false messages have urged Ukrainians to turn off their phones at a specific time of night, citing cybersafety. The regulator took order for the search and seizure operation from Judge Purushottam B Jadhav, Sebi Special Judge / Additional Sessions Judge. In 2014, Pavel Durov fled the country after allies of the Kremlin took control of the social networking site most know just as VK. Russia's intelligence agency had asked Durov to turn over the data of anti-Kremlin protesters. Durov refused to do so. Telegram has become more interventionist over time, and has steadily increased its efforts to shut down these accounts. But this has also meant that the company has also engaged with lawmakers more generally, although it maintains that it doesn’t do so willingly. For instance, in September 2021, Telegram reportedly blocked a chat bot in support of (Putin critic) Alexei Navalny during Russia’s most recent parliamentary elections. Pavel Durov was quoted at the time saying that the company was obliged to follow a “legitimate” law of the land. He added that as Apple and Google both follow the law, to violate it would give both platforms a reason to boot the messenger from its stores.
from ye
