🔸به اطلاع دانشجویان گرامی می‌رساند با توجه به مشکلات عدیدهٔ اخیر در بحث تغذیه و با پیگیری‌های مکرر شورای صنفی از ادارهٔ تغذیهٔ دانشگاه؛ مقرر شد تا سریعاً مسئول مربوطه نسبت به عودت اقلام بی‌کیفیت و تهیهٔ مواد اولیهٔ درجه یک اقدام نماید.
🔸به اطلاع دانشجویان گرامی می‌رساند با توجه به مشکلات عدیدهٔ اخیر در بحث تغذیه و با پیگیری‌های مکرر شورای صنفی از ادارهٔ تغذیهٔ دانشگاه؛ مقرر شد تا سریعاً مسئول مربوطه نسبت به عودت اقلام بی‌کیفیت و تهیهٔ مواد اولیهٔ درجه یک اقدام نماید.
The S&P 500 fell 1.3% to 4,204.36, and the Dow Jones Industrial Average was down 0.7% to 32,943.33. The Dow posted a fifth straight weekly loss — its longest losing streak since 2019. The Nasdaq Composite tumbled 2.2% to 12,843.81. Though all three indexes opened in the green, stocks took a turn after a new report showed U.S. consumer sentiment deteriorated more than expected in early March as consumers' inflation expectations soared to the highest since 1981. "The argument from Telegram is, 'You should trust us because we tell you that we're trustworthy,'" Maréchal said. "It's really in the eye of the beholder whether that's something you want to buy into." Telegram has become more interventionist over time, and has steadily increased its efforts to shut down these accounts. But this has also meant that the company has also engaged with lawmakers more generally, although it maintains that it doesn’t do so willingly. For instance, in September 2021, Telegram reportedly blocked a chat bot in support of (Putin critic) Alexei Navalny during Russia’s most recent parliamentary elections. Pavel Durov was quoted at the time saying that the company was obliged to follow a “legitimate” law of the land. He added that as Apple and Google both follow the law, to violate it would give both platforms a reason to boot the messenger from its stores. Right now the digital security needs of Russians and Ukrainians are very different, and they lead to very different caveats about how to mitigate the risks associated with using Telegram. For Ukrainians in Ukraine, whose physical safety is at risk because they are in a war zone, digital security is probably not their highest priority. They may value access to news and communication with their loved ones over making sure that all of their communications are encrypted in such a manner that they are indecipherable to Telegram, its employees, or governments with court orders. For example, WhatsApp restricted the number of times a user could forward something, and developed automated systems that detect and flag objectionable content.
from ye
