Суд не стал арестовывать экс-директора центра Федерального Сибирского научно-клинического центра ФМБА России в Красноярске, находящегося в коме. Ходатайство следствия об аресте бывшего генерального директора организации Бориса Баранкина, задержанного по подозрению в коррупции, оставлено судом без рассмотрения. Об этом сообщили ТАСС в главном следственном управлении СК РФ по Красноярскому краю и Хакасии.
Суд не стал арестовывать экс-директора центра Федерального Сибирского научно-клинического центра ФМБА России в Красноярске, находящегося в коме. Ходатайство следствия об аресте бывшего генерального директора организации Бориса Баранкина, задержанного по подозрению в коррупции, оставлено судом без рассмотрения. Об этом сообщили ТАСС в главном следственном управлении СК РФ по Красноярскому краю и Хакасии.
BY ТАСС / Сибирь
Warning: Undefined variable $i in /var/www/group-telegram/post.php on line 260
Right now the digital security needs of Russians and Ukrainians are very different, and they lead to very different caveats about how to mitigate the risks associated with using Telegram. For Ukrainians in Ukraine, whose physical safety is at risk because they are in a war zone, digital security is probably not their highest priority. They may value access to news and communication with their loved ones over making sure that all of their communications are encrypted in such a manner that they are indecipherable to Telegram, its employees, or governments with court orders. The fake Zelenskiy account reached 20,000 followers on Telegram before it was shut down, a remedial action that experts say is all too rare. On December 23rd, 2020, Pavel Durov posted to his channel that the company would need to start generating revenue. In early 2021, he added that any advertising on the platform would not use user data for targeting, and that it would be focused on “large one-to-many channels.” He pledged that ads would be “non-intrusive” and that most users would simply not notice any change. "And that set off kind of a battle royale for control of the platform that Durov eventually lost," said Nathalie Maréchal of the Washington advocacy group Ranking Digital Rights. Multiple pro-Kremlin media figures circulated the post's false claims, including prominent Russian journalist Vladimir Soloviev and the state-controlled Russian outlet RT, according to the DFR Lab's report.
from ye
