Нашел в древней новости довольно изящный способ обозвать фейсов "собаками сутулыми" или там "цепными псами режима" — расшифровать УЗКС не как "защиту конституционного строя", а как норматив по дрессировке собак. Впрочем, по сути и не поспоришь
Нашел в древней новости довольно изящный способ обозвать фейсов "собаками сутулыми" или там "цепными псами режима" — расшифровать УЗКС не как "защиту конституционного строя", а как норматив по дрессировке собак. Впрочем, по сути и не поспоришь
You may recall that, back when Facebook started changing WhatsApp’s terms of service, a number of news outlets reported on, and even recommended, switching to Telegram. Pavel Durov even said that users should delete WhatsApp “unless you are cool with all of your photos and messages becoming public one day.” But Telegram can’t be described as a more-secure version of WhatsApp. He said that since his platform does not have the capacity to check all channels, it may restrict some in Russia and Ukraine "for the duration of the conflict," but then reversed course hours later after many users complained that Telegram was an important source of information. In addition, Telegram now supports the use of third-party streaming tools like OBS Studio and XSplit to broadcast live video, allowing users to add overlays and multi-screen layouts for a more professional look. False news often spreads via public groups, or chats, with potentially fatal effects. In a message on his Telegram channel recently recounting the episode, Durov wrote: "I lost my company and my home, but would do it again – without hesitation."
from ye
