⚡️"Досье шпиона": в субботу 23 ноября в районе н.п. Большое Жирово (Фатежский район, Курская область) тремя ракетами ATACMS поражён комплекс С-400.
Уничтожена РЛС 92Н6Е и две пусковые установки. Погибли пять офицеров дивизиона, в том числе командир и начальник штаба, а также трое сотрудников АО "Алмаз-Антей".
Информацию подтверждает ASTRA, правда, с некоторыми отличающимися деталями: по их данным погибло четыре российских военнослужащих, а запущенных ракет всего было пять.
⬆️На фото сгоревшая РЛС с большой дырой в антенном полотне. #БытьИли
⚡️"Досье шпиона": в субботу 23 ноября в районе н.п. Большое Жирово (Фатежский район, Курская область) тремя ракетами ATACMS поражён комплекс С-400.
Уничтожена РЛС 92Н6Е и две пусковые установки. Погибли пять офицеров дивизиона, в том числе командир и начальник штаба, а также трое сотрудников АО "Алмаз-Антей".
Информацию подтверждает ASTRA, правда, с некоторыми отличающимися деталями: по их данным погибло четыре российских военнослужащих, а запущенных ракет всего было пять.
⬆️На фото сгоревшая РЛС с большой дырой в антенном полотне. #БытьИли
If you initiate a Secret Chat, however, then these communications are end-to-end encrypted and are tied to the device you are using. That means it’s less convenient to access them across multiple platforms, but you are at far less risk of snooping. Back in the day, Secret Chats received some praise from the EFF, but the fact that its standard system isn’t as secure earned it some criticism. If you’re looking for something that is considered more reliable by privacy advocates, then Signal is the EFF’s preferred platform, although that too is not without some caveats. "The argument from Telegram is, 'You should trust us because we tell you that we're trustworthy,'" Maréchal said. "It's really in the eye of the beholder whether that's something you want to buy into." Artem Kliuchnikov and his family fled Ukraine just days before the Russian invasion. Right now the digital security needs of Russians and Ukrainians are very different, and they lead to very different caveats about how to mitigate the risks associated with using Telegram. For Ukrainians in Ukraine, whose physical safety is at risk because they are in a war zone, digital security is probably not their highest priority. They may value access to news and communication with their loved ones over making sure that all of their communications are encrypted in such a manner that they are indecipherable to Telegram, its employees, or governments with court orders. Telegram has become more interventionist over time, and has steadily increased its efforts to shut down these accounts. But this has also meant that the company has also engaged with lawmakers more generally, although it maintains that it doesn’t do so willingly. For instance, in September 2021, Telegram reportedly blocked a chat bot in support of (Putin critic) Alexei Navalny during Russia’s most recent parliamentary elections. Pavel Durov was quoted at the time saying that the company was obliged to follow a “legitimate” law of the land. He added that as Apple and Google both follow the law, to violate it would give both platforms a reason to boot the messenger from its stores.
from ye
