В преддверии дня женщин в науке вы узнаете, как женщины преодолевали предубеждения своего времени, в чем состояли их открытия и почему их вклад в науку так важен.
🕰 8.02, 19:30 📍 Кофейня-коворкинг Letters and Numbers 〰️ от 2.500 AMD
В преддверии дня женщин в науке вы узнаете, как женщины преодолевали предубеждения своего времени, в чем состояли их открытия и почему их вклад в науку так важен.
🕰 8.02, 19:30 📍 Кофейня-коворкинг Letters and Numbers 〰️ от 2.500 AMD
Telegram has gained a reputation as the “secure” communications app in the post-Soviet states, but whenever you make choices about your digital security, it’s important to start by asking yourself, “What exactly am I securing? And who am I securing it from?” These questions should inform your decisions about whether you are using the right tool or platform for your digital security needs. Telegram is certainly not the most secure messaging app on the market right now. Its security model requires users to place a great deal of trust in Telegram’s ability to protect user data. For some users, this may be good enough for now. For others, it may be wiser to move to a different platform for certain kinds of high-risk communications. Either way, Durov says that he withdrew his resignation but that he was ousted from his company anyway. Subsequently, control of the company was reportedly handed to oligarchs Alisher Usmanov and Igor Sechin, both allegedly close associates of Russian leader Vladimir Putin. One thing that Telegram now offers to all users is the ability to “disappear” messages or set remote deletion deadlines. That enables users to have much more control over how long people can access what you’re sending them. Given that Russian law enforcement officials are reportedly (via Insider) stopping people in the street and demanding to read their text messages, this could be vital to protect individuals from reprisals. In 2014, Pavel Durov fled the country after allies of the Kremlin took control of the social networking site most know just as VK. Russia's intelligence agency had asked Durov to turn over the data of anti-Kremlin protesters. Durov refused to do so. Although some channels have been removed, the curation process is considered opaque and insufficient by analysts.
from ye
