РИА «Новости» сообщило, как «американское издание» раскрыло «страшную правду» об Украине. Издание оказалось российским
В США раскрыли страшную правду об Украине». Под таким заголовком РИА «Новости» рассказывает о публикации в англоязычном издании Strategic Culture. Но на самом деле издание не американское, принадлежит оно российской организации, по-видимому, связанной с «Ростехом» и за систематическое распространение дезинформации внесенной в британский, канадский и украинский санкционные списки.
РИА «Новости» сообщило, как «американское издание» раскрыло «страшную правду» об Украине. Издание оказалось российским
В США раскрыли страшную правду об Украине». Под таким заголовком РИА «Новости» рассказывает о публикации в англоязычном издании Strategic Culture. Но на самом деле издание не американское, принадлежит оно российской организации, по-видимому, связанной с «Ростехом» и за систематическое распространение дезинформации внесенной в британский, канадский и украинский санкционные списки.
For Oleksandra Tsekhanovska, head of the Hybrid Warfare Analytical Group at the Kyiv-based Ukraine Crisis Media Center, the effects are both near- and far-reaching. "Like the bombing of the maternity ward in Mariupol," he said, "Even before it hits the news, you see the videos on the Telegram channels." At the start of 2018, the company attempted to launch an Initial Coin Offering (ICO) which would enable it to enable payments (and earn the cash that comes from doing so). The initial signals were promising, especially given Telegram’s user base is already fairly crypto-savvy. It raised an initial tranche of cash – worth more than a billion dollars – to help develop the coin before opening sales to the public. Unfortunately, third-party sales of coins bought in those initial fundraising rounds raised the ire of the SEC, which brought the hammer down on the whole operation. In 2020, officials ordered Telegram to pay a fine of $18.5 million and hand back much of the cash that it had raised. Under the Sebi Act, the regulator has the power to carry out search and seizure of books, registers, documents including electronics and digital devices from any person associated with the securities market. If you initiate a Secret Chat, however, then these communications are end-to-end encrypted and are tied to the device you are using. That means it’s less convenient to access them across multiple platforms, but you are at far less risk of snooping. Back in the day, Secret Chats received some praise from the EFF, but the fact that its standard system isn’t as secure earned it some criticism. If you’re looking for something that is considered more reliable by privacy advocates, then Signal is the EFF’s preferred platform, although that too is not without some caveats.
from ye
