Чистая прибыль ВТБ за 10 месяцев достигла 405 млрд рублей. Банк приближается к годовому таргету в 550 млрд, несмотря на ужесточение денежно-кредитной политики.
Как отметил первый зампред правления ВТБ Дмитрий Пьянов, длительное повышение ставок провоцирует реализацию кредитных рисков. Но даже в условиях шторма на процентном рынке банк не собирается пересматривать стратегию и планирует достичь стратегических целей по прибыли суммарно за 2024-2025 годы.
👉 Будем держать руку на пульсе, а вы не переключайте канал!👇 @trubapodneglinnoy
Чистая прибыль ВТБ за 10 месяцев достигла 405 млрд рублей. Банк приближается к годовому таргету в 550 млрд, несмотря на ужесточение денежно-кредитной политики.
Как отметил первый зампред правления ВТБ Дмитрий Пьянов, длительное повышение ставок провоцирует реализацию кредитных рисков. Но даже в условиях шторма на процентном рынке банк не собирается пересматривать стратегию и планирует достичь стратегических целей по прибыли суммарно за 2024-2025 годы.
👉 Будем держать руку на пульсе, а вы не переключайте канал!👇 @trubapodneglinnoy
BY Труба под Неглинной
Warning: Undefined variable $i in /var/www/group-telegram/post.php on line 260
Telegram has gained a reputation as the “secure” communications app in the post-Soviet states, but whenever you make choices about your digital security, it’s important to start by asking yourself, “What exactly am I securing? And who am I securing it from?” These questions should inform your decisions about whether you are using the right tool or platform for your digital security needs. Telegram is certainly not the most secure messaging app on the market right now. Its security model requires users to place a great deal of trust in Telegram’s ability to protect user data. For some users, this may be good enough for now. For others, it may be wiser to move to a different platform for certain kinds of high-risk communications. One thing that Telegram now offers to all users is the ability to “disappear” messages or set remote deletion deadlines. That enables users to have much more control over how long people can access what you’re sending them. Given that Russian law enforcement officials are reportedly (via Insider) stopping people in the street and demanding to read their text messages, this could be vital to protect individuals from reprisals. The company maintains that it cannot act against individual or group chats, which are “private amongst their participants,” but it will respond to requests in relation to sticker sets, channels and bots which are publicly available. During the invasion of Ukraine, Pavel Durov has wrestled with this issue a lot more prominently than he has before. Channels like Donbass Insider and Bellum Acta, as reported by Foreign Policy, started pumping out pro-Russian propaganda as the invasion began. So much so that the Ukrainian National Security and Defense Council issued a statement labeling which accounts are Russian-backed. Ukrainian officials, in potential violation of the Geneva Convention, have shared imagery of dead and captured Russian soldiers on the platform. Recently, Durav wrote on his Telegram channel that users' right to privacy, in light of the war in Ukraine, is "sacred, now more than ever." At the start of 2018, the company attempted to launch an Initial Coin Offering (ICO) which would enable it to enable payments (and earn the cash that comes from doing so). The initial signals were promising, especially given Telegram’s user base is already fairly crypto-savvy. It raised an initial tranche of cash – worth more than a billion dollars – to help develop the coin before opening sales to the public. Unfortunately, third-party sales of coins bought in those initial fundraising rounds raised the ire of the SEC, which brought the hammer down on the whole operation. In 2020, officials ordered Telegram to pay a fine of $18.5 million and hand back much of the cash that it had raised.
from ye
