KPI: ushbu tizim tashkilot muvaffaqiyatining asosiy omilidir
▶️Bugun Qishloq xo‘jaligi vazirligi va Yuristlar malakasini oshirish markazi hamkorligida "Tashkilotda KPI tizimini joriy etish" mavzusida amaliy o‘quv seminari bo‘lib o‘tdi. Seminar O‘zbekiston Respublikasi Adliya vazirligi mas’ul xodimi Baxtiyor Xodjimuratov hamda Toshkent davlat yuridik universiteti xodimi Shohrux Nurullayev tomonidan olib borildi.
⛓Mazkur uchrashuvda ishtirokchilarga KPI tizimi tushunchasi haqida batafsil ma’lumot berilib, uning tashkilot muvaffaqiyatini oshirishdagi o‘rni va ahamiyati atroflicha tahlil qilindi. Seminar davomida tashkilotlar uchun to‘g‘ri maqsad va rejalar qo‘yish, natijadorlikni aniq baholash tizimini shakllantirish va bu orqali xodimlarning samaradorligini oshirish masalalari muhokama qilindi.
✍️Jarayon davomida KPI tizimi joriy etilishi jarayonida yuzaga kelishi mumkin bo‘lgan salbiy oqibatlarning oldini olish usullari haqida ham so‘z bordi. Jumladan, noto‘g‘ri baholash yoki xodimlarda motivatsiya pasayishiga olib keluvchi omillarni bartaraf etishning samarali yo‘llari haqida fikr-mulohazalar bildirildi.
🔼Xodimlarning faoliyatini tahlil qilish va baholash, ish rejalarini takomillashtirish hamda xodimlarning individual rivojlanish rejasini ishlab chiqish usullari ko‘rib chiqildi. Shuningdek, motivatsiya turlarini to‘g‘ri qo‘llash masalalari ham keng yoritildi. Ishtirokchilarga xodimlarni rag‘batlantirish tizimini takomillashtirishda obyektiv baholash mezonlari va ularning tashkilotga keltiradigan foydasi haqida tavsiyalar berildi.
↔️Mazkur seminar nafaqat tashkilot boshqaruvchilarining, balki xodimlarning ham kasbiy rivojlanishi uchun yangi imkoniyatlar yaratishga qaratilgan amaliy bilim va ko‘nikmalarga boy bo‘ldi. Unda muhokama qilingan masalalar tashkilotlarda innovatsion boshqaruv tizimlarini joriy etish va natijadorlikni oshirishga xizmat qilishi tayin.
KPI: ushbu tizim tashkilot muvaffaqiyatining asosiy omilidir
▶️Bugun Qishloq xo‘jaligi vazirligi va Yuristlar malakasini oshirish markazi hamkorligida "Tashkilotda KPI tizimini joriy etish" mavzusida amaliy o‘quv seminari bo‘lib o‘tdi. Seminar O‘zbekiston Respublikasi Adliya vazirligi mas’ul xodimi Baxtiyor Xodjimuratov hamda Toshkent davlat yuridik universiteti xodimi Shohrux Nurullayev tomonidan olib borildi.
⛓Mazkur uchrashuvda ishtirokchilarga KPI tizimi tushunchasi haqida batafsil ma’lumot berilib, uning tashkilot muvaffaqiyatini oshirishdagi o‘rni va ahamiyati atroflicha tahlil qilindi. Seminar davomida tashkilotlar uchun to‘g‘ri maqsad va rejalar qo‘yish, natijadorlikni aniq baholash tizimini shakllantirish va bu orqali xodimlarning samaradorligini oshirish masalalari muhokama qilindi.
✍️Jarayon davomida KPI tizimi joriy etilishi jarayonida yuzaga kelishi mumkin bo‘lgan salbiy oqibatlarning oldini olish usullari haqida ham so‘z bordi. Jumladan, noto‘g‘ri baholash yoki xodimlarda motivatsiya pasayishiga olib keluvchi omillarni bartaraf etishning samarali yo‘llari haqida fikr-mulohazalar bildirildi.
🔼Xodimlarning faoliyatini tahlil qilish va baholash, ish rejalarini takomillashtirish hamda xodimlarning individual rivojlanish rejasini ishlab chiqish usullari ko‘rib chiqildi. Shuningdek, motivatsiya turlarini to‘g‘ri qo‘llash masalalari ham keng yoritildi. Ishtirokchilarga xodimlarni rag‘batlantirish tizimini takomillashtirishda obyektiv baholash mezonlari va ularning tashkilotga keltiradigan foydasi haqida tavsiyalar berildi.
↔️Mazkur seminar nafaqat tashkilot boshqaruvchilarining, balki xodimlarning ham kasbiy rivojlanishi uchun yangi imkoniyatlar yaratishga qaratilgan amaliy bilim va ko‘nikmalarga boy bo‘ldi. Unda muhokama qilingan masalalar tashkilotlarda innovatsion boshqaruv tizimlarini joriy etish va natijadorlikni oshirishga xizmat qilishi tayin.
The next bit isn’t clear, but Durov reportedly claimed that his resignation, dated March 21st, was an April Fools’ prank. TechCrunch implies that it was a matter of principle, but it’s hard to be clear on the wheres, whos and whys. Similarly, on April 17th, the Moscow Times quoted Durov as saying that he quit the company after being pressured to reveal account details about Ukrainians protesting the then-president Viktor Yanukovych. Oleksandra Matviichuk, a Kyiv-based lawyer and head of the Center for Civil Liberties, called Durov’s position "very weak," and urged concrete improvements. Telegram has gained a reputation as the “secure” communications app in the post-Soviet states, but whenever you make choices about your digital security, it’s important to start by asking yourself, “What exactly am I securing? And who am I securing it from?” These questions should inform your decisions about whether you are using the right tool or platform for your digital security needs. Telegram is certainly not the most secure messaging app on the market right now. Its security model requires users to place a great deal of trust in Telegram’s ability to protect user data. For some users, this may be good enough for now. For others, it may be wiser to move to a different platform for certain kinds of high-risk communications. On February 27th, Durov posted that Channels were becoming a source of unverified information and that the company lacks the ability to check on their veracity. He urged users to be mistrustful of the things shared on Channels, and initially threatened to block the feature in the countries involved for the length of the war, saying that he didn’t want Telegram to be used to aggravate conflict or incite ethnic hatred. He did, however, walk back this plan when it became clear that they had also become a vital communications tool for Ukrainian officials and citizens to help coordinate their resistance and evacuations. The War on Fakes channel has repeatedly attempted to push conspiracies that footage from Ukraine is somehow being falsified. One post on the channel from February 24 claimed without evidence that a widely viewed photo of a Ukrainian woman injured in an airstrike in the city of Chuhuiv was doctored and that the woman was seen in a different photo days later without injuries. The post, which has over 600,000 views, also baselessly claimed that the woman's blood was actually makeup or grape juice.
from ye