💚Присоединяйтесь к колонне «Весны» на марше 1 марта в Берлине
На предстоящей антивоенной акции мы вновь выйдем на улицы столицы Германии. Выступим против вторжения в Украину, постараемся стать голосом россиян и выразим необходимость поддержки сознательных отказчиков от военной службы.
Если вы согласны с нашими ценностями и позицией — присоединяйтесь к колонне. Запишитесь через форму, чтобы мы знали, сколько плакатов подготовить. Подробностями и лозунгами поделимся позже. Оставайтесь на связи!
💚Присоединяйтесь к колонне «Весны» на марше 1 марта в Берлине
На предстоящей антивоенной акции мы вновь выйдем на улицы столицы Германии. Выступим против вторжения в Украину, постараемся стать голосом россиян и выразим необходимость поддержки сознательных отказчиков от военной службы.
Если вы согласны с нашими ценностями и позицией — присоединяйтесь к колонне. Запишитесь через форму, чтобы мы знали, сколько плакатов подготовить. Подробностями и лозунгами поделимся позже. Оставайтесь на связи!
Telegram has gained a reputation as the “secure” communications app in the post-Soviet states, but whenever you make choices about your digital security, it’s important to start by asking yourself, “What exactly am I securing? And who am I securing it from?” These questions should inform your decisions about whether you are using the right tool or platform for your digital security needs. Telegram is certainly not the most secure messaging app on the market right now. Its security model requires users to place a great deal of trust in Telegram’s ability to protect user data. For some users, this may be good enough for now. For others, it may be wiser to move to a different platform for certain kinds of high-risk communications. Also in the latest update is the ability for users to create a unique @username from the Settings page, providing others with an easy way to contact them via Search or their t.me/username link without sharing their phone number. Right now the digital security needs of Russians and Ukrainians are very different, and they lead to very different caveats about how to mitigate the risks associated with using Telegram. For Ukrainians in Ukraine, whose physical safety is at risk because they are in a war zone, digital security is probably not their highest priority. They may value access to news and communication with their loved ones over making sure that all of their communications are encrypted in such a manner that they are indecipherable to Telegram, its employees, or governments with court orders. The company maintains that it cannot act against individual or group chats, which are “private amongst their participants,” but it will respond to requests in relation to sticker sets, channels and bots which are publicly available. During the invasion of Ukraine, Pavel Durov has wrestled with this issue a lot more prominently than he has before. Channels like Donbass Insider and Bellum Acta, as reported by Foreign Policy, started pumping out pro-Russian propaganda as the invasion began. So much so that the Ukrainian National Security and Defense Council issued a statement labeling which accounts are Russian-backed. Ukrainian officials, in potential violation of the Geneva Convention, have shared imagery of dead and captured Russian soldiers on the platform. Telegram boasts 500 million users, who share information individually and in groups in relative security. But Telegram's use as a one-way broadcast channel — which followers can join but not reply to — means content from inauthentic accounts can easily reach large, captive and eager audiences.
from ye
