Мы не предполагали, что целью СВО является "стратегическая инициатива", но уж как есть. Впрочем много раз об этом писали, скажем только: такие победы нам точно не нужны, а вот то, что к ним приучают - проблема, хотя видимо к этому придется привыкать.
Мы не предполагали, что целью СВО является "стратегическая инициатива", но уж как есть. Впрочем много раз об этом писали, скажем только: такие победы нам точно не нужны, а вот то, что к ним приучают - проблема, хотя видимо к этому придется привыкать.
One thing that Telegram now offers to all users is the ability to “disappear” messages or set remote deletion deadlines. That enables users to have much more control over how long people can access what you’re sending them. Given that Russian law enforcement officials are reportedly (via Insider) stopping people in the street and demanding to read their text messages, this could be vital to protect individuals from reprisals. Oleksandra Matviichuk, a Kyiv-based lawyer and head of the Center for Civil Liberties, called Durov’s position "very weak," and urged concrete improvements. For tech stocks, “the main thing is yields,” Essaye said. Messages are not fully encrypted by default. That means the company could, in theory, access the content of the messages, or be forced to hand over the data at the request of a government. On February 27th, Durov posted that Channels were becoming a source of unverified information and that the company lacks the ability to check on their veracity. He urged users to be mistrustful of the things shared on Channels, and initially threatened to block the feature in the countries involved for the length of the war, saying that he didn’t want Telegram to be used to aggravate conflict or incite ethnic hatred. He did, however, walk back this plan when it became clear that they had also become a vital communications tool for Ukrainian officials and citizens to help coordinate their resistance and evacuations.
from us
