عَــزِيْزْ نَفْــسْْْْْْ ٰ

عَــزِيْزْ نَفْــسْْْْْْ ٰ

عَــزِيْزْ نَفْــسْْْْْْ ٰ Telegram | DID YOU KNOW?

On February 27th, Durov posted that Channels were becoming a source of unverified information and that the company lacks the ability to check on their veracity. He urged users to be mistrustful of the things shared on Channels, and initially threatened to block the feature in the countries involved for the length of the war, saying that he didn’t want Telegram to be used to aggravate conflict or incite ethnic hatred. He did, however, walk back this plan when it became clear that they had also become a vital communications tool for Ukrainian officials and citizens to help coordinate their resistance and evacuations. "Your messages about the movement of the enemy through the official chatbot … bring new trophies every day," the government agency tweeted. Right now the digital security needs of Russians and Ukrainians are very different, and they lead to very different caveats about how to mitigate the risks associated with using Telegram. For Ukrainians in Ukraine, whose physical safety is at risk because they are in a war zone, digital security is probably not their highest priority. They may value access to news and communication with their loved ones over making sure that all of their communications are encrypted in such a manner that they are indecipherable to Telegram, its employees, or governments with court orders. Telegram users are able to send files of any type up to 2GB each and access them from any device, with no limit on cloud storage, which has made downloading files more popular on the platform. Just days after Russia invaded Ukraine, Durov wrote that Telegram was "increasingly becoming a source of unverified information," and he worried about the app being used to "incite ethnic hatred."
عَــزِيْزْ نَفْــسْْْْْْ ٰ from us

عَــزِيْزْ نَفْــسْْْْْْ ٰإذا شـعـرت بـالحـاجـة إلى يـد دافـئـة
فأمـسـك بيـدك الأخـرى،
فلن يـُهـزم شـخـصٌ يـؤمـن بنـفـسه .💭




🌹 @Aziz_N_A 🌹

Open Telegram