Faith And Folk

Forwarded from Restored Puritanism — Fides et Gens, Inseperable.

Underman:
The English term that untermensch originally derived from.
    —A person considered genetically, racially or socially inferior by innate qualities.
As opposed to Overman (übermensch), the inverse of Underman.

An issue that has been at the forefront of European discussion on demographics for centuries, is the issue of the Underman, commonly referred to as undesirables. Often fantasized in demonic ways with bizarre and inconsistent criteria.

They have however always been the following:
—persons with genetic defects.
—persons with poor physical traits.
—persons of mixed race/ tainted ancestry.
—persons of lower socioeconomic class.

Ultimately though, all 4 of these categories can be boiled down to the first one: defects in your genetic code.
—poor physical traits are produced by deficiencies in your genetic code.
—non-white ancestry can be seen as a genetic defect which causes undesirable traits, broken gene pairings, lowered intelligence and heightened aggression.
—poor socioeconomic performance is often a product of genetic code which makes you disadvantaged to your peers.
We shouldn't however forget the importance of superior culture, which we pass to our children.

While I disagree that poor socioeconomic performance equals genetic inferiority; our ancestors (who didn't understand genetics) simply understood that having children with a spouse in any of those 4 categories meant your children would likely be there also, and be disadvantaged.

Prior to industrialism, this was never an issue, as only those with clean ancestry/ genetics, had the means to successfully raise large families into adulthood (natural selection). This isn't a polemic against the industrial revolution, as it still remains the best thing to happen to the White race.

Industrialism was the product of superior men building amazing societies/ civilizations which provided excellent living standards to all, allowing the lower socioeconomic class to successfully raise large families into adulthood.

It would be inhumane, non-altruistic, non-European, to believe this was a bad thing; the issue came after when we all stopped caring. The Overman didn't care to have children, the Underman didn't care to limit their children; neither cared to select spouses on good qualities, and regressed to the mean. The result being intentionally few higher quality children, and unintentionally many lower quality children.

Europeans did come up with a solution to this issue however: family planning; i.e. birth control. On the surface this appears disastrous, the sharp decline in overall White fertility, however the fertility that does occur is significantly better quality. We're in a period of quality refinement, and if the superior White stock continue to have White children, we'll begin to grow again and surpass our current population in better quality than today.

We already see this occurring across the world (Opportunity And Adaptation), where only Whites who care about our race, are having White children, and those of quality are capable of successfully having large White families; whilst the fertility of the Non-white world is drastically grinding to a halt and shrinking.

Where's it going wrong?
Ethnic replacement (mass immigration), race-mixing and an aggressive cultural push for disinterest in having White children; particularly quality White children.

What am I supposed to take away from this?
While I push for you all to have large White families, we mustn't forget quality. I want us all to have large quality/ healthy White families.

The previous post gathered much criticism (Stop Making Excuses) for all the wrong reasons; the criticism should have been that I didn't explicitly express quality enough, but instead the protests were "it's all too hard!" or "it's impossible to find a decent White spouse!".

This is ultimately just natural selection at work, only those good enough genetically and culturally, will be able to court a quality White spouse and have large healthy White families; while the inferior are left to complain.

www.group-telegram.com/us/FaithAndFolk3.com/3159

74 viewsJan 15 at 17:01

Underman:
The English term that untermensch originally derived from.
    —A person considered genetically, racially or socially inferior by innate qualities.
As opposed to Overman (übermensch), the inverse of Underman.

An issue that has been at the forefront of European discussion on demographics for centuries, is the issue of the Underman, commonly referred to as undesirables. Often fantasized in demonic ways with bizarre and inconsistent criteria.

They have however always been the following:
—persons with genetic defects.
—persons with poor physical traits.
—persons of mixed race/ tainted ancestry.
—persons of lower socioeconomic class.

Ultimately though, all 4 of these categories can be boiled down to the first one: defects in your genetic code.
—poor physical traits are produced by deficiencies in your genetic code.
—non-white ancestry can be seen as a genetic defect which causes undesirable traits, broken gene pairings, lowered intelligence and heightened aggression.
—poor socioeconomic performance is often a product of genetic code which makes you disadvantaged to your peers.
We shouldn't however forget the importance of superior culture, which we pass to our children.

While I disagree that poor socioeconomic performance equals genetic inferiority; our ancestors (who didn't understand genetics) simply understood that having children with a spouse in any of those 4 categories meant your children would likely be there also, and be disadvantaged.

Prior to industrialism, this was never an issue, as only those with clean ancestry/ genetics, had the means to successfully raise large families into adulthood (natural selection). This isn't a polemic against the industrial revolution, as it still remains the best thing to happen to the White race.

Industrialism was the product of superior men building amazing societies/ civilizations which provided excellent living standards to all, allowing the lower socioeconomic class to successfully raise large families into adulthood.

It would be inhumane, non-altruistic, non-European, to believe this was a bad thing; the issue came after when we all stopped caring. The Overman didn't care to have children, the Underman didn't care to limit their children; neither cared to select spouses on good qualities, and regressed to the mean. The result being intentionally few higher quality children, and unintentionally many lower quality children.

Europeans did come up with a solution to this issue however: family planning; i.e. birth control. On the surface this appears disastrous, the sharp decline in overall White fertility, however the fertility that does occur is significantly better quality. We're in a period of quality refinement, and if the superior White stock continue to have White children, we'll begin to grow again and surpass our current population in better quality than today.

We already see this occurring across the world (Opportunity And Adaptation), where only Whites who care about our race, are having White children, and those of quality are capable of successfully having large White families; whilst the fertility of the Non-white world is drastically grinding to a halt and shrinking.

Where's it going wrong?
Ethnic replacement (mass immigration), race-mixing and an aggressive cultural push for disinterest in having White children; particularly quality White children.

What am I supposed to take away from this?
While I push for you all to have large White families, we mustn't forget quality. I want us all to have large quality/ healthy White families.

The previous post gathered much criticism (Stop Making Excuses) for all the wrong reasons; the criticism should have been that I didn't explicitly express quality enough, but instead the protests were "it's all too hard!" or "it's impossible to find a decent White spouse!".

This is ultimately just natural selection at work, only those good enough genetically and culturally, will be able to court a quality White spouse and have large healthy White families; while the inferior are left to complain.

BY Faith And Folk