"Суд проигнорировал показания Якушева. Который присутствовал при разговоре о смене организации осуществляющей строительный контроль. Но суд не принял во внимание показатели свидетеля. Зато в приговоре содержатся показания Черноуса, который отсутствовал при этой беседе. Аушев лично принял решение сменить контроль. При этом присутствовал Якушев, его показания суд проигнорировал - а он подтвердил что указаний Кляйн не давал.".
"Суд проигнорировал показания Якушева. Который присутствовал при разговоре о смене организации осуществляющей строительный контроль. Но суд не принял во внимание показатели свидетеля. Зато в приговоре содержатся показания Черноуса, который отсутствовал при этой беседе. Аушев лично принял решение сменить контроль. При этом присутствовал Якушев, его показания суд проигнорировал - а он подтвердил что указаний Кляйн не давал.".
BY За Кляйна
Warning: Undefined variable $i in /var/www/group-telegram/post.php on line 260
The last couple days have exemplified that uncertainty. On Thursday, news emerged that talks in Turkey between the Russia and Ukraine yielded no positive result. But on Friday, Reuters reported that Russian President Vladimir Putin said there had been some “positive shifts” in talks between the two sides. Under the Sebi Act, the regulator has the power to carry out search and seizure of books, registers, documents including electronics and digital devices from any person associated with the securities market. Artem Kliuchnikov and his family fled Ukraine just days before the Russian invasion. Telegram has become more interventionist over time, and has steadily increased its efforts to shut down these accounts. But this has also meant that the company has also engaged with lawmakers more generally, although it maintains that it doesn’t do so willingly. For instance, in September 2021, Telegram reportedly blocked a chat bot in support of (Putin critic) Alexei Navalny during Russia’s most recent parliamentary elections. Pavel Durov was quoted at the time saying that the company was obliged to follow a “legitimate” law of the land. He added that as Apple and Google both follow the law, to violate it would give both platforms a reason to boot the messenger from its stores. Telegram has gained a reputation as the “secure” communications app in the post-Soviet states, but whenever you make choices about your digital security, it’s important to start by asking yourself, “What exactly am I securing? And who am I securing it from?” These questions should inform your decisions about whether you are using the right tool or platform for your digital security needs. Telegram is certainly not the most secure messaging app on the market right now. Its security model requires users to place a great deal of trust in Telegram’s ability to protect user data. For some users, this may be good enough for now. For others, it may be wiser to move to a different platform for certain kinds of high-risk communications.
from us
