🇺🇳 LaTercera Comisión de la 79º sesión de la Asamblea General de la ONU aprobó una resolución tradicional, iniciada por Rusia, para combatir el heroísmo del nazismo, el neonazismo y otras prácticas que contribuyen a la escalada de formas contemporáneas de racismo, discriminación racial, la xenofobia y la intolerancia relacionada. 40 países la copatrocinaron.
✅116 países votaron a favor; ❌54 en contra; ➖11se abstuvieron.
Aquí es una lista de los que se han pronunciado en contra de la condena del racismo y por heroizar el nazismo:
EEUU, Ucrania, España, Canadá, Reino Unido, Alemania, Francia, Italia, Polonia, Moldavia, Estonia, Letonia, Lituania, Austria, Australia, Albania, Bélgica, Bulgaria, Dinamarca, Grecia, Chipre, Países Bajos, Portugal, Rumanía, Eslovaquia, Eslovenia, Finlandia, Croacia, República Checa, Suecia, Japón, Andorra, Bosnia y Herzegovina, Georgia, Hungría, Nueva Zelandia, Islandia, Irlanda, Kiribati, Liechtenstein, Luxemburgo, Malawi, Malta, Noruega, San Marino, Macedonia del Norte, Mónaco, Islas Marshall, Micronesia, República de Corea, Palau, Tonga, Fiji, Montenegro.
🇺🇳 LaTercera Comisión de la 79º sesión de la Asamblea General de la ONU aprobó una resolución tradicional, iniciada por Rusia, para combatir el heroísmo del nazismo, el neonazismo y otras prácticas que contribuyen a la escalada de formas contemporáneas de racismo, discriminación racial, la xenofobia y la intolerancia relacionada. 40 países la copatrocinaron.
✅116 países votaron a favor; ❌54 en contra; ➖11se abstuvieron.
Aquí es una lista de los que se han pronunciado en contra de la condena del racismo y por heroizar el nazismo:
EEUU, Ucrania, España, Canadá, Reino Unido, Alemania, Francia, Italia, Polonia, Moldavia, Estonia, Letonia, Lituania, Austria, Australia, Albania, Bélgica, Bulgaria, Dinamarca, Grecia, Chipre, Países Bajos, Portugal, Rumanía, Eslovaquia, Eslovenia, Finlandia, Croacia, República Checa, Suecia, Japón, Andorra, Bosnia y Herzegovina, Georgia, Hungría, Nueva Zelandia, Islandia, Irlanda, Kiribati, Liechtenstein, Luxemburgo, Malawi, Malta, Noruega, San Marino, Macedonia del Norte, Mónaco, Islas Marshall, Micronesia, República de Corea, Palau, Tonga, Fiji, Montenegro.
"He has to start being more proactive and to find a real solution to this situation, not stay in standby without interfering. It's a very irresponsible position from the owner of Telegram," she said. "There are a lot of things that Telegram could have been doing this whole time. And they know exactly what they are and they've chosen not to do them. That's why I don't trust them," she said. Again, in contrast to Facebook, Google and Twitter, Telegram's founder Pavel Durov runs his company in relative secrecy from Dubai. The company maintains that it cannot act against individual or group chats, which are “private amongst their participants,” but it will respond to requests in relation to sticker sets, channels and bots which are publicly available. During the invasion of Ukraine, Pavel Durov has wrestled with this issue a lot more prominently than he has before. Channels like Donbass Insider and Bellum Acta, as reported by Foreign Policy, started pumping out pro-Russian propaganda as the invasion began. So much so that the Ukrainian National Security and Defense Council issued a statement labeling which accounts are Russian-backed. Ukrainian officials, in potential violation of the Geneva Convention, have shared imagery of dead and captured Russian soldiers on the platform. As a result, the pandemic saw many newcomers to Telegram, including prominent anti-vaccine activists who used the app's hands-off approach to share false information on shots, a study from the Institute for Strategic Dialogue shows.
from us
