ظاهرا ارتش ظفرمند سوریه یکبار دیگر یک عراده تانک T-90A خود را از دست داده است. تصویری از این تانک T-90A غنیمت گرفته شده توسط معارضین در حومه زیتان در استان حلب. @Military_War_History
ظاهرا ارتش ظفرمند سوریه یکبار دیگر یک عراده تانک T-90A خود را از دست داده است. تصویری از این تانک T-90A غنیمت گرفته شده توسط معارضین در حومه زیتان در استان حلب. @Military_War_History
Andrey, a Russian entrepreneur living in Brazil who, fearing retaliation, asked that NPR not use his last name, said Telegram has become one of the few places Russians can access independent news about the war. These entities are reportedly operating nine Telegram channels with more than five million subscribers to whom they were making recommendations on selected listed scrips. Such recommendations induced the investors to deal in the said scrips, thereby creating artificial volume and price rise. On February 27th, Durov posted that Channels were becoming a source of unverified information and that the company lacks the ability to check on their veracity. He urged users to be mistrustful of the things shared on Channels, and initially threatened to block the feature in the countries involved for the length of the war, saying that he didn’t want Telegram to be used to aggravate conflict or incite ethnic hatred. He did, however, walk back this plan when it became clear that they had also become a vital communications tool for Ukrainian officials and citizens to help coordinate their resistance and evacuations. For Oleksandra Tsekhanovska, head of the Hybrid Warfare Analytical Group at the Kyiv-based Ukraine Crisis Media Center, the effects are both near- and far-reaching. In the United States, Telegram's lower public profile has helped it mostly avoid high level scrutiny from Congress, but it has not gone unnoticed.
from us
