@PatriotFrontSightings » Thomas Rousseau's appearance on the Patrick Bet-David Podcast has been positively received by over 400,000 viewers on YouTube. With over 16,000 comments, the overwhelming consensus of the audience seems to be a clear call for support of Patriot Front, Rousseau, and nationalism itself. This decisive show of support comes after the highly questionable coincidence of many accounts vocally supportive of PF on X being suspended just minutes before the interview went live. The resonance of PF's nationalism with such a broad audience is an example of the viability of patriotic politics on a large scale, and a stinging indictment of the conservative movement's failures to address the true concepts of race and nationality in American history.
Many comments describe Rousseau's rebuke of Bet-David's rhetoric, which was perceived by many as biased and out of character for the Iranian commentator. Despite the relentless accusations and attempted psychoanalytical tactics of Bet-David, the conversation remained civil and articulate, proving the positive character of the organization. This interview seems to mark another sturdy nail in the coffin of the conservative establishment's astroturfed "fed-jacketing" campaign.
@PatriotFrontSightings » Thomas Rousseau's appearance on the Patrick Bet-David Podcast has been positively received by over 400,000 viewers on YouTube. With over 16,000 comments, the overwhelming consensus of the audience seems to be a clear call for support of Patriot Front, Rousseau, and nationalism itself. This decisive show of support comes after the highly questionable coincidence of many accounts vocally supportive of PF on X being suspended just minutes before the interview went live. The resonance of PF's nationalism with such a broad audience is an example of the viability of patriotic politics on a large scale, and a stinging indictment of the conservative movement's failures to address the true concepts of race and nationality in American history.
Many comments describe Rousseau's rebuke of Bet-David's rhetoric, which was perceived by many as biased and out of character for the Iranian commentator. Despite the relentless accusations and attempted psychoanalytical tactics of Bet-David, the conversation remained civil and articulate, proving the positive character of the organization. This interview seems to mark another sturdy nail in the coffin of the conservative establishment's astroturfed "fed-jacketing" campaign.
On December 23rd, 2020, Pavel Durov posted to his channel that the company would need to start generating revenue. In early 2021, he added that any advertising on the platform would not use user data for targeting, and that it would be focused on “large one-to-many channels.” He pledged that ads would be “non-intrusive” and that most users would simply not notice any change. Multiple pro-Kremlin media figures circulated the post's false claims, including prominent Russian journalist Vladimir Soloviev and the state-controlled Russian outlet RT, according to the DFR Lab's report. The last couple days have exemplified that uncertainty. On Thursday, news emerged that talks in Turkey between the Russia and Ukraine yielded no positive result. But on Friday, Reuters reported that Russian President Vladimir Putin said there had been some “positive shifts” in talks between the two sides. The next bit isn’t clear, but Durov reportedly claimed that his resignation, dated March 21st, was an April Fools’ prank. TechCrunch implies that it was a matter of principle, but it’s hard to be clear on the wheres, whos and whys. Similarly, on April 17th, the Moscow Times quoted Durov as saying that he quit the company after being pressured to reveal account details about Ukrainians protesting the then-president Viktor Yanukovych. On Feb. 27, however, he admitted from his Russian-language account that "Telegram channels are increasingly becoming a source of unverified information related to Ukrainian events."
from us
