Русские писатели и философы, восхищавшиеся Гитлером и нацизмом и служившие им: Иван Ильин, Иван Шмелёв, Иван Сургучёв, Дмитрий Мережковский, Зинаида Гиппиус, Сергей Лифарь, Александр Бенуа, Антон Карташёв, о. Иоанн Шаховской, Николай Арсеньев, Борис Вышеславцев, Сергей Аскольдов, Пётр Краснов, Борис Филиппов, Михаил Пришвин.
Русские писатели и философы, восхищавшиеся Гитлером и нацизмом и служившие им: Иван Ильин, Иван Шмелёв, Иван Сургучёв, Дмитрий Мережковский, Зинаида Гиппиус, Сергей Лифарь, Александр Бенуа, Антон Карташёв, о. Иоанн Шаховской, Николай Арсеньев, Борис Вышеславцев, Сергей Аскольдов, Пётр Краснов, Борис Филиппов, Михаил Пришвин.
BY Роман Газенко
Warning: Undefined variable $i in /var/www/group-telegram/post.php on line 260
Right now the digital security needs of Russians and Ukrainians are very different, and they lead to very different caveats about how to mitigate the risks associated with using Telegram. For Ukrainians in Ukraine, whose physical safety is at risk because they are in a war zone, digital security is probably not their highest priority. They may value access to news and communication with their loved ones over making sure that all of their communications are encrypted in such a manner that they are indecipherable to Telegram, its employees, or governments with court orders. Official government accounts have also spread fake fact checks. An official Twitter account for the Russia diplomatic mission in Geneva shared a fake debunking video claiming without evidence that "Western and Ukrainian media are creating thousands of fake news on Russia every day." The video, which has amassed almost 30,000 views, offered a "how-to" spot misinformation. Unlike Silicon Valley giants such as Facebook and Twitter, which run very public anti-disinformation programs, Brooking said: "Telegram is famously lax or absent in its content moderation policy." In the United States, Telegram's lower public profile has helped it mostly avoid high level scrutiny from Congress, but it has not gone unnoticed. Messages are not fully encrypted by default. That means the company could, in theory, access the content of the messages, or be forced to hand over the data at the request of a government.
from us
