в Харьковской области за период с 08.00 14.11.2024 по 08.00 15.11.2024 нанесен 1 удар УМПК и 4 удара РСЗО/ОТРК.
в Сумской области за период с 08.00 14.11.2024 по 08.00 15.11.2024 2 удара РСЗО/ОТРК. Впервые с начала боевых действий на Курском направлении не нанесено ни одного удара УМПК 🤔 - самые тихие сутки на северном направлении.
в Харьковской области за период с 08.00 14.11.2024 по 08.00 15.11.2024 нанесен 1 удар УМПК и 4 удара РСЗО/ОТРК.
в Сумской области за период с 08.00 14.11.2024 по 08.00 15.11.2024 2 удара РСЗО/ОТРК. Впервые с начала боевых действий на Курском направлении не нанесено ни одного удара УМПК 🤔 - самые тихие сутки на северном направлении.
BY ХарьковскаяРусь 🇷🇺
Warning: Undefined variable $i in /var/www/group-telegram/post.php on line 260
Telegram has gained a reputation as the “secure” communications app in the post-Soviet states, but whenever you make choices about your digital security, it’s important to start by asking yourself, “What exactly am I securing? And who am I securing it from?” These questions should inform your decisions about whether you are using the right tool or platform for your digital security needs. Telegram is certainly not the most secure messaging app on the market right now. Its security model requires users to place a great deal of trust in Telegram’s ability to protect user data. For some users, this may be good enough for now. For others, it may be wiser to move to a different platform for certain kinds of high-risk communications. He said that since his platform does not have the capacity to check all channels, it may restrict some in Russia and Ukraine "for the duration of the conflict," but then reversed course hours later after many users complained that Telegram was an important source of information. Also in the latest update is the ability for users to create a unique @username from the Settings page, providing others with an easy way to contact them via Search or their t.me/username link without sharing their phone number. Telegram, which does little policing of its content, has also became a hub for Russian propaganda and misinformation. Many pro-Kremlin channels have become popular, alongside accounts of journalists and other independent observers. The War on Fakes channel has repeatedly attempted to push conspiracies that footage from Ukraine is somehow being falsified. One post on the channel from February 24 claimed without evidence that a widely viewed photo of a Ukrainian woman injured in an airstrike in the city of Chuhuiv was doctored and that the woman was seen in a different photo days later without injuries. The post, which has over 600,000 views, also baselessly claimed that the woman's blood was actually makeup or grape juice.
from us
